Abstract:Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants to make causal inferences from observational data. The field is currently undergoing a revolution fuelled by increasing numbers of genetic variants demonstrated to be associated with exposures in genome-wide association studies, and the public availability of summarized data on genetic associations with exposures and outcomes from large consortia. A Mendelian randomization analysis with many genetic variants can be performed relatively simply using summarized data. However, a causal interpretation is only assured if each genetic variant satisfies the assumptions of an instrumental variable. To provide some protection against failure of these assumptions, robust methods for instrumental variable analysis have been proposed. Here, we develop three extensions to instrumental variable methods using: i) robust regression, ii) the penalization of weights from candidate instruments with heterogeneous causal estimates, and iii) L1 penalization. Results from a wide variety of robust methods, including the recently-proposed MR-Egger and median-based methods, are compared in an extensive simulation study. We demonstrate that two methods, robust regression in an inverse-variance weighted method and a simple median of the causal estimates from the individual variants, have considerably improved Type 1 error rates compared with conventional methods in a wide variety of scenarios when up to 30% of the genetic variants are invalid instruments. While the MR-Egger method gives unbiased estimates when its assumptions are satisfied, these estimates are less efficient than those from other methods and are highly sensitive to violations of the assumptions. Methods that make different assumptions should be used routinely to assess the robustness of findings from applied Mendelian randomization investigations with multiple genetic variants.

Mendelian Randomization when Many Instruments are Invalid: Hierarchical Empirical Bayes Estimation

Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization

Robust instrumental variable methods using multiple candidate instruments with application to Mendelian randomization

Inferring the Direction of a Causal Link and Estimating Its Effect via a Bayesian Mendelian Randomization Approach

Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator

An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting

Selecting invalid instruments to improve Mendelian randomization with two-sample summary data

Inference After Selecting Plausibly Valid Instruments with Application to Mendelian Randomization

Mendelian randomization with fine-mapped genetic data: Choosing from large numbers of correlated instrumental variables

A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization

Weak instruments in multivariable Mendelian randomization: methods and practice

LASSO-type instrumental variable selection methods with an application to Mendelian randomization

Estimating time-varying exposure effects through continuous-time modelling in Mendelian randomization

Multivariable Mendelian randomization with incomplete measurements on the exposure variables in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

A Latent Mixture Model for Heterogeneous Causal Mechanisms in Mendelian Randomization

Estimating Time‐Varying Exposure Effects Through Continuous‐Time Modelling in Mendelian Randomization

Using Instruments for Selection to Adjust for Selection Bias in Mendelian Randomization

Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology

GENIUS-MAWII: for robust Mendelian randomization with many weak invalid instruments

A Random Effects Model-based Method of Moments Estimation of Causal Effect in Mendelian Randomization Studies

Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies