Abstract:Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants to make causal inferences from observational data. The field is currently undergoing a revolution fuelled by increasing numbers of genetic variants demonstrated to be associated with exposures in genome-wide association studies, and the public availability of summarized data on genetic associations with exposures and outcomes from large consortia. A Mendelian randomization analysis with many genetic variants can be performed relatively simply using summarized data. However, a causal interpretation is only assured if each genetic variant satisfies the assumptions of an instrumental variable. To provide some protection against failure of these assumptions, robust methods for instrumental variable analysis have been proposed. Here, we develop three extensions to instrumental variable methods using: i) robust regression, ii) the penalization of weights from candidate instruments with heterogeneous causal estimates, and iii) L1 penalization. Results from a wide variety of robust methods, including the recently-proposed MR-Egger and median-based methods, are compared in an extensive simulation study. We demonstrate that two methods, robust regression in an inverse-variance weighted method and a simple median of the causal estimates from the individual variants, have considerably improved Type 1 error rates compared with conventional methods in a wide variety of scenarios when up to 30% of the genetic variants are invalid instruments. While the MR-Egger method gives unbiased estimates when its assumptions are satisfied, these estimates are less efficient than those from other methods and are highly sensitive to violations of the assumptions. Methods that make different assumptions should be used routinely to assess the robustness of findings from applied Mendelian randomization investigations with multiple genetic variants.

GENIUS-MAWII: for robust Mendelian randomization with many weak invalid instruments

On Mendelian Randomization Mixed-Scale Treatment Effect Robust Identification (MR MiSTERI) and Estimation for Causal Inference

Robust instrumental variable methods using multiple candidate instruments with application to Mendelian randomization

Selecting invalid instruments to improve Mendelian randomization with two-sample summary data

Weak-Instrument Robust Tests in Two-Sample Summary-Data Mendelian Randomization

Debiased Estimating Equation Method for Versatile and Efficient Mendelian Randomization Using Large Numbers of Correlated Weak and Invalid Instruments

Debiased Multivariable Mendelian Randomization

An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting

Testing and correcting for weak and pleiotropic instruments in two‐sample multivariable Mendelian randomization

A Random Effects Model-based Method of Moments Estimation of Causal Effect in Mendelian Randomization Studies

Unbiased estimation and asymptotically valid inference in multivariable Mendelian randomization with many weak instrumental variables

Weak instruments in multivariable Mendelian randomization: methods and practice

Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator

Mendelian Randomization when Many Instruments are Invalid: Hierarchical Empirical Bayes Estimation

Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization

Identification and Estimation of the Bi-Directional MR with Some Invalid Instruments

A robust two-sample Mendelian Randomization method integrating GWAS with multi-tissue eQTL summary statistics

Winner's Curse Free Robust Mendelian Randomization with Summary Data

Reciprocal causation mixture model for robust Mendelian randomization analysis using genome-scale summary data

Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology

A latent outcome variable approach for Mendelian randomization using the expectation maximization algorithm