SÉANCE TENANTE: Deconstruction in (the) Place of Ethics Now

Laurent Milesi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.988908
2015-01-01
Parallax
Abstract:One of the perceived hallmarks of ‘vintage deconstruction’, ever since Derrida’s trio of monographs in 1967, has been its questioning of origins and of the plenitude of presence, and more recently – since Specters ofMarx grappled with issues of spectrality, messianicity and virtuality – of the contemporary and the ‘now’. Equally prevalent, until Critchley’s timely corrective and Bernasconi’s earlier work on Derrida’s indebtedness to Levinas, had been the impatience with deconstruction’s alleged inability to propose an ethics as well as a politics on grounds that it always defers the criticalmoment of decision-making, whereas both the so-called ethical choice involving responsibility and political action would be deemed to require for maximum efficiency an urgency of response in the here and now, forthwith, séance tenante.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?