Abstract:The notion of ideology plays a crucial role in the social sciences in general and discourse studies in particular because it helps us conceptualize, problematize and understand the complex relationship between language use and power structures. In this respect, ideology analysis contributes to a holistic, multilevel and complex understanding of discourse (Shi-xu 2014). The research programs of social scientific approaches to ideology and the still emerging field of discourse studies show several similarities and parallel developments. For both programs, knowledge and power, symbolic realities and their material mediation, as well as the practical production and consequences of knowledge and belief systems are at the very center of interest. During the last century researchers in both fields crossed their way, engaging in debates that enriched the understanding of ideology as a phenomenon as well as of discourse research. It could even be argued that discourse studies were founded on the shoulders of the giants of ideology research. Francis Bacon's analysis of idola, left Hegelian critique on religion and inverted consciousness from Marx, to Lukács, and Gramsci's notion of hegemony have been highly influential when the linguistic turn in social sciences and humanities lead the research agenda to the specific influence of language for the construction of social perception. Here the work of Louis Althusser has to be mentioned. His theory of ideology can be seen as hinge between Marxist notions of ideology and discourse studies. His focus on ideology as representation of an imaginary relationship and a material reality, or the conceptualization of the constitution of subjects through the semiotic practice of interpellation can be understood as a starting point for the arising multidisciplinary research program of critical discourse studies. Finally, Foucault's work on discourse, power and subjectivation has inspired contemporary scholars analysing knowledge as a political tool that is forming people's identities (Foucault 1980). Important inputs came also from Fairclough's work on the relation of ideology and power (1989) as well as from Laclau and Mouffe's (1985) radical stance on hegemony and towards the discursive foundations of realities.

Has Critique Run Out of Steam?—On Discourse Research as Critical Inquiry

The notion of criticism at the present time: from postcriticism to an ethics of reading well

Revisiting Critical Theory in the Twenty-First Century

Discourse analysis as critique

A Critic on the Other Side of the Rhine? On the Appropriations of Foucault's Political Thought by the Heirs of the Frankfurt School

Luhmann Reconsidered: Steps Towards an Empirical Research Programme in the Sociology of Communication?

Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives

Bourdieu, the Sociology of Culture and Cultural Studies: A Critique

An Autonomy Reflection on Communication Research

Discourse and Violence

Reverse Versus Radical Discourse: A Qualified Critique of Butler and Foucault, with an Alternative Interactive Theorisation

Baudrillard and the Critique of Political Economy: A Reconsideration

The power of discourse: Michel Foucault and critical theory

Foucault and Power: A Critique and Retheorization

Critique of Everyday Life:A Philosophy towards Concrete Ontology

From Philosophy to Social Theory of Critique——Post-Philosophical Interpretation of Marx's Theory

Beyond the "inimitable" Goffman: from "social theory" to social theorizing in a Goffmanesque manner

Studying ideology and discourse as knowledge, power and material practices

Media Ethics, Moral Controversies, and the Sociology of Critique

Reflections on "keyword Criticism" in Literary Research

From the Reflection on Methodology to the Self-critique of Humanities