Abstract:The abolition of the judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China in Qi Yuling's case marks the end of the trend of developing a judicial constitutional review system in China, but issues of courts invoking constitutional norms in judicial decisions continue to arise. This essay investigates the actual situation of the Constitution in judicial decisions by categorizing 1907 court decisions that invoked the Constitution as the reasoning basis and the court decisions which invoked the Constitution as the decision-making basis and by exploring the logic of the use of the Constitution by Chinese judges. In the absence of a constitutional review system, the primary sense of Chinese judges invoking constitutional norms is characterized by "simplistic reasoning ", "politicized enforcement " and the "parent law " concept. The insufficient judgment reason is a universal feature of judicial adjudication in Chinese courts. However, due to the lack of a constitutional review system, the poor perception of the interpretation and application of the constitution may exacerbate the lack of legal arguments invoked by the Constitution. The political model of Constitution enforcement in China makes judges invoke the Constitution in judicial decisions by "asserting the prestige of the Constitution ", which leads to numerous errors in legal argumentation in judicial decisions. This also reflects the tendency of "political enforcement " to take precedence over the legal enforcement of the Constitution. The influence of the old "parent law " concept is that judges can arbitrarily apply constitutional norms directly to civil cases, including fundamental rights norms. By summarizing and describing the above three features, we can depict the activities of current Chinese courts in invoking the Constitution.

Introduction to "constitutionalism, Reform, and the Nature of the Chinese State: Dialogues among Western and Chinese Scholars, Iii"

The Hypothesis of Cultural Differences in Sino-Us Relation with International Political Conflicts

Understanding China: A Dialogue with Philip Huang

The Boundary Tablet Marking the Intellectual Province of Constitutional Law——A Dialogue about the Constituent Power between a Political Scientist and a Constitutional Legal Scholar

A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China

A Debate on the Probability of Constitutional Government in Modem China

Rethinking “the Third Sphere”: The Dualistic Unity of State and Society in China, Past and Present

A Constitution Without Constitutionalism? the Paths of Constitutional Development in China

From "people's Sovereignty" to "human Right"--Vicissitude of Study Mode of Science of Constitution in China

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China†

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China

Introduction to Special Issue on Digital Formations and Chinese Experiences

Towards Constitutional Re-Enlightenment: Teaching American Constitutional Law in China

The Irony in the Lineage of Modern Chinese Constitutions and Constitutionalism

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Reflection and Assumption on the Reconstruction of Public Philosophy in China

The Limits of Constitutional Amendments and the Challenges of Constitutional Amending Models——A Legal Appraisal in the Context of China's Constitutional Development in the Past Sixty Years

Constitutional Supervision in China after the 2018 Amendment of the PRC Constitution: Refining the Narrative of Constitutional Supremacy in a Socialist Legal System

The Reflections on Constitutional Culture and Construction of System in China

A Systemic Interpretation of Social Rights in the Chinese Constitution

Not Self-evident "Chinese Legal Ideal-Picture"