Abstract:Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) can be summarized as follows: it inherits from proportional–integral–derivative (PID) the quality that makes it such a success: the error driven, rather than model-based, control law; it takes from modern control theory its best offering: the state observer; it embraces the power of nonlinear feedback and puts it to full use; it is a useful digital control technology developed out of an experimental platform rooted in computer simulations. ADRC is made possible only when control is taken as an experimental science, instead of a mathematical one. It is motivated by the ever increasing demands from industry that requires the control technology to move beyond PID, which has dominated the practice for over 80 years. Specifically, there are four areas of weakness in PID that we strive to address: 1) the error computation; 2) noise degradation in the derivative control; 3) oversimplification and the loss of performance in the control law in the form of a linear weighted sum; and 4) complications brought by the integral control. Correspondingly, we propose four distinct measures: 1) a simple differential equation as a transient trajectory generator; 2) a noise-tolerant tracking differentiator; 3) the nonlinear control laws; and 4) the concept and method of total disturbance estimation and rejection. Together, they form a new set of tools and a new way of control design. Times and again in experiments and on factory floors, ADRC proves to be a capable replacement of PID with unmistakable advantage in performance and practicality, providing solutions to pressing engineering problems of today. With the new outlook and possibilities that ADRC represents, we further believe that control engineering may very well break the hold of classical PID and enter a new era, an era that brings back the spirit of innovations.

A New Tuning Approach to Second-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Tuning Method for Second-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Data-driven Iterative Tuning Based Active Disturbance Rejection Control for FOPTD Model.

A Relay Feedback Method for the Tuning of Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Controllers

Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control with Partially Canceling Estimated Total Disturbance.

Active disturbance rejection control:theoretical results summary and future researches

A Tuning Method of Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Class of High-Order Processes.

Parameter Tuning for Decentralized Low-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control Scheme

Robust Tuning of Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for Time-Delay Systems with Application to a Factual Electrostatic Precipitator

Tuning Adrc for Multi-Variable System Based on Existing Pid Parameters

Improved Active Disturbance Rejection Control for the DAB Converter with 4-DF Modulation

Quantitative Tuning of Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for FOPTD Model With Application to Power Plant Control

On Tuning and Practical Implementation of Active Disturbance Rejection Controller: A Case Study from a Regenerative Heater in a 1000 MW Power Plant

Frequency response-based decoupling tuning for feedforward compensation ADRC of distributed parameter systems

A synthesis method for first-order active disturbance rejection controllers: Procedures and field tests

Tuning of Active Disturbance Rejection Control with Application to Power Plant Furnace Regulation

Frequency-Domain Analysis of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection Control Via the Describing Function Method.

From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control

A Simulative Study on Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) as a Control Tool for Practitioners

A Robust Control Methodology Based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control and Input Shaping

A review on active disturbance rejection control of power generation systems: Fundamentals, tunings and practices