Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Decrease the Risk of Cemented Vertebra Refracture Compared with Bilateral Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
Qiang Zhou,Yanlin Wan,Le Ma,Liang Dong,Weijian Yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s438036
IF: 3.829
2024-02-17
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Abstract:Qiang Zhou, Yanlin Wan, Le Ma, Liang Dong, Weijian Yuan Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Qiang Zhou, Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Fukang Road 24&num, Tianjin, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the refracture rate of the cemented vertebral body of percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP) and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Methods: Ninety-four patients with single segment thoracolumbar OVCF were randomly divided into two groups (47 patients in each) and underwent PCVP or bilateral PKP surgery, respectively. Refracture of cemented vertebral body, bone cement injection volume and cement pattern, cement leakage rate, total surgical time, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles and anterior vertebral height, Oswestry disability index questionnaire (ODI) and visual analog scales (VAS) were recorded. Results: The PCVP group had significantly lower refracture incidence of the cemented vertebral than the bilateral PKP group (p< 0.05). There was a significant postoperative improvement in the VAS score and ODI in both group (p< 0.01), and no significant difference was found between two groups. The operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times were significantly less in the PCVP group than in the bilateral PKP group (p< 0.01). The mean kyphosis angle correction and vertebral height restoration in the PCVP group was significantly less than that in the bilateral PKP group (p< 0.01). Conclusion: Both PCVP and PKP were safe and effective treatments for OVCF. The PCVP had lower refracture rate of the cemented vertebral than the bilateral PKP group, and PCVP entailed less exposure to fluoroscopy and shorter operation time than bilateral PKP. Keywords: osteoporosis, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, percutaneous curved vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty For the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and vertebroplasty (PVP) produce better outcomes in pain relief, functional recovery, health-related quality of life and lower mortality compared with non-surgical or sham treatment. 1–4 However, complications such as refracture of previously operative vertebral body have been reported. 5–10 Refracture of augmented vertebral body may result in decreased vertebral body height, aggravation of the kyphotic deformity, and even compression of the spinal cord, which usually requires further treatment. The commonly used puncture approach for PKP or PVP is a bipedicular approach. Unipedicular approach can get the same pain relief as bipedicular approach, and it has been shown to have lower operation time, X-ray irradiation, wound degree and better cost-effectiveness. 11,12 However, in the traditional unilateral straight approach, bone cement likely only fills the same side of application, while the contralateral vertebrae are poorly filled, which increases the risk of re-collapse of the non-augmented side. 13 Furthermore, compared to the bipedicular approach, the unipedicular approach requires a more aggressive, lateral-to-medial insertion angle, which increases the risk of nerves or paravertebral vessels injury. Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP) provides a new approach for the treatment of OVCF, in which the curved injection cannula can easily reach the contralateral hemivertebra body and achieve a uniform bone cement distribution in vertebral body through unilateral approach 14,15 (Figure 1). Compared to the traditional unipedicular approach, the insertion angle of PCVP is less aggressive and lateral-to-medial which lowers the risk of injury to paravertebral vessels or nerves. With the cannula withdrawn point-by-point, the cement is injected into the vertebra at each point through the ventral side openings of the cannula, which makes the cement distribution in vertebra more uniform (Figure 1). Figure 1 ( A ) Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Device; ( B ) The bone cement distribution of PCVP is kidney-shaped and mainly located in the anterior and middle of the vertebral body; ( C ) insert curved injection cannula via straight trocar into the contralateral hemivertebra body; ( D and E ) The bone cement was injected with the cannula withdrawn point-by-point. It is unknown whether PCVP can reduce refracture incidence of cemented vertebra compared to bilateral PKP. In this study, we focused our research on the refracture of cemented v -Abstract Truncated-
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology