Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the value of parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating histopathological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).METHODS:Between May 2014 and December 2015, a total of 69 patients who were surgically and pathologically diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma were recruited for the study. We examined 61 clear cell RCC (ccRCC), and 8 non-clear cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC, including 7 chromophobe RCC and 1 papillary RCC). All the ccRCC were divided into well differentiated group (n=46), moderately differentiated group (n=8), and poorly differentiated group (n=7). In addition to routine renal magnetic resonance imaging examination performed on a 3.0-Tesla MR system, all patients were imaged with axial intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging. Using biexponential model, we calculated the diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D(*)), and perfusion fraction (f).RESULTS:The D and f values of the ccRCC were higher (each P<0.05) than that for non-ccRCC [D (1.29±0.30)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, D(*) (42.92±20.21)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and f (35.71±6.61)% versus D (0.78±0.23)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, D(*) (32.60±11.33)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and f (21.52±8.44)% ]. In the well differentiated group of ccRCC, we found D of (1.36±0.29)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, D(*) (38.39±18.51)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and f (36.40±6.96)%. The D, D(*,) f values of moderately differentiated lesions were (1.10±0.24)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, (59.90±20.23)×10(-3) mm(2)/s, and (32.88±4.02)%, respectively, those of the poorly differentiated group were (1.03±0.16)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, (53.28±18.74)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and (34.42±6.21)%. The well differentiated group of ccRCC showed a higher D value than the moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated groups (each P<0.05). D(*) values were significantly lower for the well differentiated group than for the moderately differentiated group (P<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of D values were 90.2% and 87.5% when focusing on the differentiation of ccRCC. For the diagnosis of ccRCC, the sensitivity and specificity of f values were 98.4% and 75.0%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS:IVIM-DWI can provide certain reliable value in evaluating pathological subtype and differentiation degree of renal cell carcinomas. D and f values are useful to distinguish ccRCC from non-ccRCC. D value is also promising for estimating the differentiation degree of ccRCC, and to indicate the biological behavior of RCC.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis: Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with R-Field of View Diffusion Weighted Imaging

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

Comparison of Utility of Histogram Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and R2*For Differentiation of Low-Grade from High-Grade Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Whole-lesion Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Cervical Cancers with Different Differentiation

Subtype Differentiation of Small (≤ 4 Cm) Solid Renal Mass Using Volumetric Histogram Analysis of DWI at 3-T MRI

Diffusion kurtosis versus diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: a comparative study

Diffusion-weighted and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Analysis of Microstructural Differences in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Comparative Study

Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Differentiation of Minimal Fat Angiomyolipoma from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Rectal Cancer Invasiveness: Whole-Lesion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) Histogram Analysis by Comparison of Reduced Field-of-View and Conventional DWI Techniques

The Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Malignant Renal Tumors

Comparative Study of Conventional Diffusion- Weighted Imaging and Introvoxel Incoherent Motion in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Application of DWI with Various B Values in Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Fuhrman Grades SHEN

Differentiation of Prostate Cancer and Stromal Hyperplasia in the Transition Zone with Histogram Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Small Solid Renal Tumors (≤4 Cm) at 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential Model of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing Between Common Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma

Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for the Assessment of Cervical Cancer.

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.

[Application of Diffusion-Weighted Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes].

Volumetric Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis in Differentiating Intrahepatic Mass‐Forming Cholangiocarcinoma from Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for the differentiation between lymphoma and metastatic lymph nodes of squamous cell carcinoma in head and neck region.

Renal Cell Carcinoma: Preoperative Evaluate the Grade of Histological Malignancy Using Volumetric Histogram Analysis Derived from Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging