The Diagnostic Value of Enhanced Magnifying Endoscopy for Early Gastric Cancer

郭涛,陆星华,杨爱明,姚方,周炜洵,吴晰,费贵军,伍东升,舒慧君
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2014.07.004
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of magnifying endoscopy enhanced by acetic acid-indigo carmine mixture (ME-AIM) and magnifying endoscopy enhanced with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC).Methods A total of 317 focal gastric lesions,determined by WLE on the basis of the assessment of mucosal shape and color,were further characterized with ME-NBI and ME-AIM.The accuracy of each endoscopic method for the diagnosis of EGC was compared with the pathological results as the gold standard.Results For the diagnosis of EGC,the sensitivity,specificity,and accuracy of ME-NBI were 100.0% (11/11),99.7% (305/306) and 99.7% (316/317)respectively; those of ME-AIM were 90.9% (10/11),99.0% (303/306) and 98.7% (313/317) respectively; those of WLE were 72.7% (8/11),88.2% (270/306)and 87.7% (278/317)respectively.The specificity and accuracy of both ME-NBI and ME-AIM were significantly better than those of WLE (P <0.05).Both ME-NBI and ME-AIM had higher sensitivity than WLE,but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05).ME-NBI was not superior to ME-AIM in the diagnosis of EGC (P > 0.05).Conclusion WLE is still a useful modality in screening EGC.BothME-NBI and ME-AIM can improve the diagnostic accuracy in comparison with WLE,but ME-NBI is not superior to ME-AIM in identifying EGC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?