Comparative analysis of double-blind review and open review of Ph.D candidates' thesis

Shu-jing LIANG,Hong CHEN,Qing-huan ZHOU,Lin QU,Si-qin ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-1924.2012.04.015
2012-01-01
Abstract:Improvement of the review of dissertation for doctoral degree is important for the training of qualified doctors.Current practice includes double-blind review and open review.This paper compares and analyses the outcome of the two kinds of reviews and found that double-blind review is more objective that the other(the mean of open review score is 96.39±2.069,the mean of double-blind review score is 85.18±6.635.P=0.001,P<0.01).In the end some suggestions are proposed to improve the double-blind review system.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?