The Comparison and Biological Evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Scaffold for Tissue Engineered Artificial Rib

唐华,徐志飞,秦雄,刘昌胜,赵学维
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4497.2008.05.016
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety of porous phosphate calcium and PLGA/HA by biological evaluation, and then choose the more suitable material for tissue engineered scaffold. Methods Extracts of the materials were used to perform pyrogenic test, Hemolytic test and acute toxicity test to evaluate the material's safety. The porosity and content of HA was determined by Micro CT. The proliferations of the cells were observed by calculating the number six days successively after the provine's BMSCs were inoculated on the scaffold. The adhesions to the different materials were observed at 4, 12, and 24 hours, sfter rinoculating. Results Two materials have no acute toxic, haemolytic and pyrogenic reaction. The result of micro CT demonstrated that the content of HA of porous phosphate calcium was (1101.2228±0.6184)mg/ccm which was higher than PLGA/HA(P≤0.05) and equal to the normal human bone. The sizes of porous phosphate calcium were also more homogenous than PLGA/HA and connect with each other. The experiment of cell proliferation showed that the cells cultivated with porous phone calcium proliferated more rapidly than those with PLGA/HA (P≤0.05). The rate of the cell adhesion to both material was less than 50%(P>0.05).Conclusion The porous calcium and PLGA/HA is safe material. As a tissue engineered seaffold for artificial rib, porous phosphate calcium is more suitable than PLGA/HA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?