Abstract:Objective: To investigate the application of severity classification according to the protocol on the Diagnosis and Treatment of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)by the National Health Commission of China, pneumonia severity index(PSI) and CURB-65　in risk stratification and prognostic assessment of COVID-19. Methods: Clinical data of 234 in-hospital patients with COVID-19 were collected and retrospectively reviewed in Wuhan Tongji Hospital. Patients were divided into 3 groups (common, severe, and critical type) at admission according to the sixth version of the protocol issued by the National Health Commission of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of COVID-19. At the same time, the severity of pneumonia was calculated by PSI and CURB-65, and the patients were stratified into 3 risk groups, namely mild, moderate, and severe groups. The hospital mortality rate was evaluated in each group. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve(AUC) for predicting hospital mortality in each rule were assessed. Results: According to the severity classification of Chinese protocol, the proportion of patients with common type, severe type, and the critical type was 15.8%, 75.6%, and 8.5%, respectively. No in-hospital death occurred in the common type. As for PSI and CURB-65, greater proportions of patients were classified as low risk(79.1% and 75.6%, respectively), while smaller proportions of patients were classified as moderate and high risk(16.2%, 15.0%; 4.7%, 9.4%, respectively). In-hospital death occurred in low and moderate risk patients identified by these 2 scoring systems. The mortality of the critical group of the Chinese protocol was 65%, and the sensitivity and specificity of predicting in-hospital mortality were 36.4% and 97.0%, respectively. The mortality in the high risk group of PSI and CURB-65 was 100% and 77.3%. The risk class V of PSI and CURB-65 score 3-5 had high specificity(100% and 97.4%, respectively)but low sensitivity(33.3% and 51.5%, respectively)in predicting in-hospital mortality. The AUC of the Chinese protocol severity classification, PSI, and CURB-65 was 0.735, 0.951, and 0.912. The optimal cut-off point of PSI was risk class Ⅳ, and the sensitivity and specificity for predicting mortality were 90.9% and 90.5%. The optimal cut-off point of CURB-65 was score 2, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 84.8% and 85.6%. Conclusions: PSI and CURB-65 can be used for risk stratification and prognostic assessment in patients with COVID-19.

Comparison between PSI and CURB-65 score for the prognostic assessment of elderly community acquired pneumonia

Study on the Clinical Pathway of Community Acquired Pneumonia

The Comparisons of Severity Scoring Systems for Community Acquired Pneumonia Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Usefulness of Pneumonia Severity Index and CURB-65 for Severity Evaluation of Healthcare-associated Pneumonia

Comparison of Pneumonia Severity Index and CURB-65 Score with Laboratory Parameters in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality for Community Acquired Pneumonia

A new prediction model for assessing the clinical outcomes of ICU patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a decision tree analysis.

Analysis of prognostic factors for hospitalized patients aged 95 years and over with community-acquired pneumonia

Predictive value of community-acquired pneumonia severity scores on lung cancer patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonitis: a retrospective analysis

Efficacy and Significance of Various Scores for Pneumonia Severity in the Management of Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia in China

Pneumonia in Geriatric Patients and Prediction of Mortality Based on the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), CURB-65, Frailty Index (FI), and FI-Lab21 Scores

Performance of various pneumonia severity models for predicting adverse outcomes in elderly inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia

CURB-65 score predicted mortality in community-acquired pneumonia better than IDSA/ATS minor criteria in a low-mortality-rate setting

Application and comparison of scoring indices to predict outcomes in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia

Validation and meta-analysis of various severity scale system for predicting mortality and ICU admission in com-munity-acquired pneumonia patients

Comparison of Chinese Predictive Rule with Three International Ones for Assessing Severity of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Serum Procalcitonin, White Blood Cell and Hypersensitive C-reactive Protein Combined with Age Established a New Prediction Model in Predicting ICU Admission in Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Patients.

Compliance with the CURB-65 Score and the Consequences of Non-Implementation.

Prognostic values of CURB-65 score and inflammatory factors for hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia patients

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Improves the Accuracy and Sensitivity of Pneumonia Severity Index in Predicting 30-Day Mortality of CAP Patients

The Predictive Values of Different Scoring Systems for Mortality of Older Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Who Underwent Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Comparison of Severity Classification of Chinese Protocol, Pneumonia Severity Index and CURB-65 in Risk Stratification and Prognostic Assessment of Coronavirus Disease 2019