Comparison of Chinese Predictive Rule with Three International Ones for Assessing Severity of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

LI Cui-jun,ZHANG Li-qiang,ZHU Hong,HE Bei,YAO Wan-zhen,ZHAO Ming-wu

2009-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the performances of three foreign prediction rules with the severity criteria of the Chinese guidelines for CAP in identifying low-risk patients and evaluating severe pneumonia.Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from patients admitted with CAP to the respiratory department of Peking University Third Hospital from January of 2000 to April of 2007.Patients were stratified according to the Pneumonia Severity Index(PSI),CURB and CURB65 severity scores and the severity criteria of the Chinese guidelines.Furthermore,patients were classified into three risk groups(low,moderate and high)in the light of each rule.Distribution of patients,hospital mortality and intensive care unit(ICU)admission rate in each group of the predictive rules were analyzed.Sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive values,negative predictive values and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves(AUC)for predicting hospital mortality and ICU admission rate in each rule were compared too.Results In the light of PSI(class Ⅰ～Ⅲ),CURB(score 0)and CURB65(score 0~1),greater proportions of patients were classified as low-risk(73.9%,61.2% and 69.1%,respectively),while smaller proportions of patients were classed as moderate and high risk(20.0%,28.5%,21.8%;6.1%,10.3%,9.1%,respectively).Both low and moderate risk patients identified by these three rules had mortality(1.6%,2.0%,1.8%;9.1%,6.4%,8.3%,respectively).However,according to the severity criteria of the Chinese guidelines,smaller proportions of patients(7.3%)was identified as low-risk,while greater proportions of patients were defined as moderate and high risk(44.8%,47.9%),nevertheless,no death or ICU admission occurred in the low-risk group and ICU admission rate were 1.4% in moderate-risk group.The severity criteria of the Chinese guidelines had high sensitivity(100.0%,95.5%)and low specificity(55.5%,59.4%)for predicting hospital mortality and admission to ICU.On the contrary,The PSI Ⅴ,CURB score 2～4 and CURB65 score 3～5 all had high specificity but low sensitivity for the two outcomes.The severity criteria of the Chinese guidelines had a greater discriminatory power to predict mortality and admission to ICU(AUC:0.777,0.774).All these rules had low positive predictive values but high negative predictive values for the two outcomes.Conclusion The severity criteria of the Chinese guidelines and three foreign prediction rules have different strengths and weaknesses as prediction tools.Further research to identify better prediction tools is required.