Study on the Clinical Pathway of Community Acquired Pneumonia

孙宏永,徐峰,徐志豪,沈华浩
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2785.2007.08.009
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the usefulness of the clinical application of the pneumonia severity index(PSI)grade system in local area and to discuss the clinical pathway of community acquired pneumonia(CAP).Methods Three hundred and twenty-seven patients with CAP were recruited and divided randomly into two groups:the interference group and the routine group.In the interference group,the patients were determined to be hospitalized by PSI grade system and treated by the guideline on diagnosis and treatment of CAP established by Chinese Medical Association in 1999.Whereas in the routine group,the patients were treated by the routine experiences.The admission rate,length of stay and clinic turnover of the two groups were analyzed.Results In interference group,total mortality was 5.49%,low-risk group 0.55%,high-risk group 17.6%,cure and improvement rate 91.0%,other kickbacks 3.53%,admission rate 32.2%,the mean length of stay(6.70±1.22)days.In routine group,total mortality was 5.56%,cure and improvement rate 90.3%,other kickbacks 4.17%,admission rate 52.8%,the mean length of stay(8.90±1.31)days.Between the two groups,there was no significant statistically difference in cure and improvement rate(P0.05),and the discrepancy of admission rate was 20.6%,length of stay was shorten for 2.20 days(P0.01).Conclusion Results from this study suggest that the risk of mortality and the effectiveness of further treatment in CAP patients could be evaluated by the PSI grade system.The PSI grade system and guideline for CAP were used as the primary clinical pathway,which could decrease the use of the medical resource and the patients' medical payout while not affected the clinical turnover of CAP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?