Establishment of Quality Evaluation Index System for Clinical Medical Research Papers
LUAN Jia,DENG Qiangting,LI Yue,ZHANG Yilin,LI Jie,SUN Fei,LI Na,CHEN Ximin,XIE Wenhong,DU Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11946/cjstp.202206290499
2023-01-01
Abstract:[Purposes] This paper aims to provide medical journal editorial offices/reviewers with detailed review criteria to control the overall academic quality of Chinese medical journals by establishing a quality evaluation index system for clinical medical research papers. [Methods] Literature research, expert interview, empirical study, group discussion, and other research methods were used to collect and screen out the quality evaluation indexes of clinical medical research papers. Indexes were categorized according to structural dimensions. [Findings] A quality evaluation index system for clinical medical research papers is preliminarily established, including 17 indexes, namely, ethics committee review and consent approval document, the subject′s informed consent signature, the ethics review declaration, the conflict of interest statement, the authenticity of the research, the authenticity of report, the correlation with clinical practice, citation of evidence（literature） such as secondary research and transformation research, registration of clinical studies, reporting standards, correct research design, methodological quality, risk of bias assessment, complete statistical information and correct interpretation of statistical results, innovation of scientific issues based on subject areas, improvement of evidence quality levels, and methodological innovations. The system is divided into 6 dimensions（ethics, authenticity, practicality, transparency, scientificity, and innovation）. Each evaluation index is defined and interpreted, the evaluation method is explained, and the person responsible for the review is clarified. [Conclusions] "Approaching the truth value with proper authentic method" is the core of academic quality evaluation of clinical medical research papers. To effectively control the overall academic quality of medical journals in China, we should promote standardized review process vigorously, improve the professional competence of medical science editors, and establish a certification mechanism for medical science editors.