Abstract:Background A variety of imaging techniques can be used to evaluate diffusion characteristics to differentiate malignant and benign pancreatic lesions. The diagnostic performance of diffusion parameters has not been systematic assessed. Purpose We aimed to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for pancreatic lesions. Methods A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies from inception to March 30, 2020, which involves the quantitative diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in the pancreas. Studies were reviewed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of articles was evaluated by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUATAS-2). A bivariate random-effects model was used to evaluate pooled sensitivities and specificities. Univariable meta-regression analysis was used to test the effects of factors that contributed to the heterogeneity. Results A total of 31 studies involving 1558 patients were ultimately eligible for data extraction. The lowest heterogeneity was found in specificity of perfusion fraction ( f ) with the I 2 value was 17.97% and Cochran p value was 0.28. However, high heterogeneities were found for the other parameters (all I 2 > 50%). There was no publication bias found in funnel plot ( p = 0.30) for the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameter. The pooled sensitivities for ADC, f , pure diffusion coefficient ( D ), and pseudo diffusivity coefficient ( D *) were 83%, 81%, 76%, and 84%, respectively. The pooled specificities for ADC, f , D , and D * were 87%, 83%, 69%, and 81% respectively. The areas under the curves for ADC, f , D , and D * were 0.92, 0.87, 0.79, and 0.87 respectively. Conclusion Quantitative DWI and IVIM have a good diagnostic performance for differentiating malignant and benign pancreatic lesions. Key Points • IVIM has high sensitivity and specificity (84% and 83%, respectively) for differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions, which is comparable to that of the ADC (83% and 87%, respectively). • The ADC has an excellent diagnostic performance for differentiating malignant from benign IPMNs (sensitivity, 0.83; specificity, 0.92); the f has the best diagnostic performance for differentiating pancreatic carcinoma from PNET (sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.85). • For the ADC, using a maximal b value < 800 s/mm 2 has a higher diagnostic accuracy than ≥ 800 s/mm 2 ; performing in a high field strength (3.0 T) system has a higher diagnostic accuracy than a low field strength (1.5 T) for pancreatic lesions.

Effective Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Parameters for Differentiation Between Mass-Forming Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Utility of the Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Decreasing Unnecessary Biopsy Rates for Suspected Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions: A Single-Centre, Retrospective Study

Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Predicting Malignancy of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas

Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma from Healthy Pancreas Using Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging:Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Derived Parameters

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient-Based Histogram Analysis Differentiates Histological Subtypes of Periampullary Adenocarcinoma

MRI and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Evaluation of ADC measurements among solid pancreatic masses by respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging with inversion-recovery fat-suppression technique at 3.0 T

Accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Multimodel Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Mass-Forming Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Differential Diagnosis with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Quantitative Parameters of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted Imaging (IVIM-DWI): Potential Application in Predicting Pathological Grades of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Limited Role of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) for Tumor Grade and Overall Survival in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

The Added Value of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted Imaging Parameters in Differentiating High-Grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Derived from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Differentiate Between Tumor, Tumor-Adjacent and Tumor-Distant Tissues in Resectable Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Diagnostic Performance of Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differentiating the Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Effects of Region of Interest Sizes on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements of Pleomorphic Adenoma, Warthin Tumor, and Normal Parotid Parenchyma.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer: Characteristics and Correlation With Histopathologic Parameters.

Application Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diagnosis of Different Histological Subtypes of Lung Cancers

Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Assessing the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method

A Comparative Study in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Diseases Using DWI Apparent Diffusion Coeffi-Cient and the Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficients of resectable mid‐high rectal adenocarcinoma and distal paracancerous tissue