Abstract:This two-armed study was designed to determine whether recovery after esophageal resection may be improved by introducing a new multimodal approach. For 8 mo after the new approach was introduced, all patients undergoing abdominothoracic esophageal resection were studied (Group 2; n = 42). For comparison, a retrospective analysis was also conducted using the data of all patients who had undergone this operation in the 8 mo before the introduction of the new regimen, when the traditional therapy was still in use (Group 1; n = 49). All patients received an epidural catheter at the level of T6-9 before the induction of general analgesia. Afterward, Group 1 patients were operated under general anesthesia. For postoperative pain relief, a mixture of bupivacaine 1.25 mg/mL and sufentanil 1 microg/mL was administered during 5 days without titration of the quality of analgesia. Patients in Group 2 received a preoperative bolus of 10-15 mL bupivacaine 2.5 mg/mL and 20-30 microg sufentanil. After sensory block up to T4 was confirmed, general anesthesia was introduced and intraoperatively combined with a continuous infusion of 5 mL/h of a solution containing bupivacaine 1.75 mg/mL and sufentanil 1 microg/mL. Postoperatively, the epidural infusion rate was adjusted to the need of the individual patients, who were able to administer themselves additional bolus doses of 2 mL with a lockout time of 20 min. Early tracheal extubation and forced mobilization were pursued to improve recovery. Demographic data of both groups were comparable. The pain relief of Group 2 patients was superior to that of patients in Group 1. The nitrogen balance of a subgroup of nine matched pairs of patients with comparable nutritional status was less negative in Group 2 patients on Postoperative Days 1 and 2. Patients in Group 2 were tracheally extubated earlier (mean 6.7 vs 25.1 h after admission to the intensive care unit [ICU]), mobilized earlier (mean 1.2 vs 2.0 days after surgery), discharged from the ICU earlier (mean 1.7 vs 4.0 days), and fulfilled criteria for discharge from the ICU (mean 1.8 vs 4.1 days) and from the intermediate care unit earlier (4.9 vs 6.4 days). We conclude that the multimodal approach may improve recovery and thus reduce costs after abdominothoracic esophageal resection.IMPLICATIONS: Analgesia and blockade of the perioperative stress response, combined with other aspects of postoperative therapy, may improve recovery after surgery. The intensive care unit stay after esophageal resection was reduced by a new regimen (thoracic epidural analgesia, early tracheal extubation, forced mobilization). This approach may influence the cost of major surgery.

The Improved Mediastinal Drainage Strategy for the Enhanced Recovery System after Esophagectomy.

Enhanced Recovery Care Vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mediastinal Transposition of the Omentum Reduces Infection Severity and Pharmacy Cost for Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy.

Omental transposition to mediastinum improves the outcome of postoperative intra-thoracic infections of Ivor-Lewis surgery]

The Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Central Venous Catheter Thoracic Drainage and Traditional Closed Thoracic Drainage Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: a Retrospective Analysis

Endoscope-assisted Mediastinal Drainage Therapy for Anastomosis Leakage after Esophagectomy: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Randomized Trial of an Improved Drainage Strategy Versus Routine Chest Tube after Lung Wedge Resection

Mediastinal Micro-Vessels Clipping During Lymph Node Dissection May Contribute to Reduce Postoperative Pleural Drainage.

Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal-free stitches

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Improves Short-term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy

A Novel Drainage Strategy Using Chest Tube Plus Pleural Catheter in Uniportal Upper Lobectomy: A Randomized Study

Is It Safe and Feasible to Use Multi-Lateral-pores Drainage Strategy after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery?

Prophylactic air-extraction strategy after thoracoscopic wedge resection

Comparison of Central Venous Catheter Thoracic Drainage with Traditional Closed Thoracic Drainage after Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study

Managing Esophageal Fistulae by Endoscopic Transluminal Drainage in Esophageal Cancer Patients with Superior Mediastinal Sepsis after Esophagectomy.

Clinical Application of a Multi-Groove Silicone Drain Combined with Unidirectional Negative-Pressure Drainage System in Single-Operating-port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Surgery: a Comparison Study

Perioperative outcomes of bi-pigtail catheter drainage strategy versus conventional chest tube after uniportal video-assisted thoracic lung surgery

Postoperative Application and Effect of Surgical Drainage Device Package in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

A Multimodal Approach to Control Postoperative Pathophysiology and Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Abdominothoracic Esophagectomy