Abstract:Background: Mortality and complication rates for surgical esophagectomy remain high despite progress in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Minimally invasive surgery and intraoperative goal-directed fluid management are gaining popularity in Taiwan; however, perioperative complications and short-term outcomes have been rarely reported. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the surgical procedures performed as well as the perioperative outcomes and treatments after esophagectomy in a high-volume medical center in Taiwan. The goals of this study are to compare the complications and the following treatment between different surgical procedures and to analyze if any preoperative coexisting disease and anesthesia conduct might be associated with postoperative complications and hospitalization course. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients who had undergone esophagectomy and reconstruction in 2015. Patient characteristics, type of surgery performed, method of anesthesia, postoperative hospitalization course, and additional surgical interventions were reviewed and analyzed. Results: In total, 64 patients were included. Among them, 58 patients (90.6%) were reported squamous cell carcinoma, 33 patients (51.6%) received McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), and 20 (31.3%) received Ivor-Lewis MIE. The most common postoperative complications were pulmonary complications (18.7%), such as empyema and pleural effusion, dysrhythmias (14.1%), anastomosis leakage (14.1%), vocal cord paralysis (9.4%), gastric tube stenosis (4.7%), chyle leakage (4.7%), and acute kidney injury (AKI, 4.7%). Twenty-five percent of patients received secondary operative interventions for the aforementioned complications. Postoperative arrhythmia (P=0.042), pulmonary complications (P=0.009), and AKI (P=0.015) were significantly associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality rates were 3.1% and 4.7% respectively. Patients with preoperative arrhythmias have a higher risk of developing post-operative dysrhythmia (P=0.013) and lung complications (P=0.036). Patients with an underlying heart disease are at higher risk of post-op AKI (P=0.002) and second surgical intervention (P=0.013). Chronic kidney diseases are associated with post-op dysrhythmia (P=0.013), lung complications (P=0.036) and post-op AKI (P≤0.01). Although McKeown MIE bore a significantly longer surgical time and higher intraoperatively-infused crystalloid than did Ivor Lewis MIE, there were no significant differences regarding postoperative cardiothoracic complications and patient outcomes. Conclusions: Postoperative outcomes of McKeown MIE and Ivor-Lewis MIE were comparable in our center and short term outcomes were similar to those in previous reports. However, despite neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), the use of minimally invasive techniques, and well-controlled anesthesia, the incidence of perioperative complications remains high. Our results suggest that patients with preoperative comorbidity of arrhythmia, heart diseases, and CKD are associated with more common post-operative complications. Furthermore, postoperative dysrhythmias, pulmonary complications, and AKI warrant special anesthetic and surgical care to prevent prolonged ICU stay.

Quality Improvement in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Outcome Improvement Through Data Review

Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation and Long-Term Mortality in Patients among Esophageal Cancer.

Perioperative management and outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: case study of a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan

Refinement of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Techniques After 15 Years of Experience

Development of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Milestones in the History of Esophagectomy: From Torek to Minimally Invasive Approaches

The impact of minimally-invasive esophagectomy operative duration on post-operative outcomes

696 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 2958 CASES IN SINGLE CANCER CENTER

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study

A comparative review of minimally invasive approaches to esophagectomy: technical considerations, variations, and outcomes

Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy Using Antegrade Inversion Technique in Esophageal Cancer: 10-Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Center

Circumferential resection margin rates in esophageal cancer resection- oncological equivalency and comparable clinical outcomes between open versus minimally invasive techniques: A retrospective cohort study

Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Patient Outcomes

PS01.232: SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

The impact of postoperative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy on long-term survival

Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: Experience of 124 cases in a single center.

Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.

The Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer in A Single Cancer Center