Abstract:Background: Mortality and complication rates for surgical esophagectomy remain high despite progress in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Minimally invasive surgery and intraoperative goal-directed fluid management are gaining popularity in Taiwan; however, perioperative complications and short-term outcomes have been rarely reported. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the surgical procedures performed as well as the perioperative outcomes and treatments after esophagectomy in a high-volume medical center in Taiwan. The goals of this study are to compare the complications and the following treatment between different surgical procedures and to analyze if any preoperative coexisting disease and anesthesia conduct might be associated with postoperative complications and hospitalization course. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients who had undergone esophagectomy and reconstruction in 2015. Patient characteristics, type of surgery performed, method of anesthesia, postoperative hospitalization course, and additional surgical interventions were reviewed and analyzed. Results: In total, 64 patients were included. Among them, 58 patients (90.6%) were reported squamous cell carcinoma, 33 patients (51.6%) received McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), and 20 (31.3%) received Ivor-Lewis MIE. The most common postoperative complications were pulmonary complications (18.7%), such as empyema and pleural effusion, dysrhythmias (14.1%), anastomosis leakage (14.1%), vocal cord paralysis (9.4%), gastric tube stenosis (4.7%), chyle leakage (4.7%), and acute kidney injury (AKI, 4.7%). Twenty-five percent of patients received secondary operative interventions for the aforementioned complications. Postoperative arrhythmia (P=0.042), pulmonary complications (P=0.009), and AKI (P=0.015) were significantly associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality rates were 3.1% and 4.7% respectively. Patients with preoperative arrhythmias have a higher risk of developing post-operative dysrhythmia (P=0.013) and lung complications (P=0.036). Patients with an underlying heart disease are at higher risk of post-op AKI (P=0.002) and second surgical intervention (P=0.013). Chronic kidney diseases are associated with post-op dysrhythmia (P=0.013), lung complications (P=0.036) and post-op AKI (P≤0.01). Although McKeown MIE bore a significantly longer surgical time and higher intraoperatively-infused crystalloid than did Ivor Lewis MIE, there were no significant differences regarding postoperative cardiothoracic complications and patient outcomes. Conclusions: Postoperative outcomes of McKeown MIE and Ivor-Lewis MIE were comparable in our center and short term outcomes were similar to those in previous reports. However, despite neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), the use of minimally invasive techniques, and well-controlled anesthesia, the incidence of perioperative complications remains high. Our results suggest that patients with preoperative comorbidity of arrhythmia, heart diseases, and CKD are associated with more common post-operative complications. Furthermore, postoperative dysrhythmias, pulmonary complications, and AKI warrant special anesthetic and surgical care to prevent prolonged ICU stay.

Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Patient Outcomes

The role of surgery type in postoperative atrial fibrillation and in-hospital mortality in esophageal cancer patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation and Long-Term Mortality in Patients among Esophageal Cancer.

Quality Improvement in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Outcome Improvement Through Data Review

Circumferential resection margin rates in esophageal cancer resection- oncological equivalency and comparable clinical outcomes between open versus minimally invasive techniques: A retrospective cohort study

The Prognostic Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy on Survival after Esophagectomy following a Delayed Interval after Chemoradiotherapy; A Secondary Analysis of the DICE Study

Perioperative management and outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: case study of a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan

Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study

The impact of minimally-invasive esophagectomy operative duration on post-operative outcomes

The Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Implementation and outcome of minor and major minimally invasive liver surgery in the Netherlands

Robotic-assisted esophagectomy with total mesoesophageal excision enhances R0-resection in patients with esophageal cancer: A single-center experience

Paravertebral versus EPidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophageal ResectioN (PEPMEN): A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.

Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (NST 1502): A multicenter prospective cohort study

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Better Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Than Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Short-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive oesophagectomy: A prospective study

Can Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Replace Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer? Latest Analysis of 24,233 Esophagectomies From the Japanese National Clinical Database

Proficiency in bariatric surgery may shorten the learning curve for minimally-invasive D2 gastrectomy

A retrospective study for Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomy:mininally invasive versus open esophagectomy

Clinical implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy