Abstract:Purpose Recently, global science has shown an increasing open trend, however, the characteristics of research integrity of open access (OA) publications have rarely been studied. The aim of this study is to compare the characteristics of retracted articles across different OA levels and discover whether OA level influences the characteristics of retracted articles. Design/methodology/approach The research conducted an analysis of 6,005 retracted publications between 2001 and 2020 from the Web of Science and Retraction Watch databases. These publications were categorized based on their OA levels, including Gold OA, Green OA, and non-OA. The study explored retraction rates, time lags and reasons within these categories. Findings The findings of this research revealed distinct patterns in retraction rates among different OA levels. Publications with Gold OA demonstrated the highest retraction rate, followed by Green OA and non-OA. A comparison of retraction reasons between Gold OA and non-OA categories indicated similar proportions, while Green OA exhibited a higher proportion due to falsification and manipulation issues, along with a lower occurrence of plagiarism and authorship issues. The retraction time lag was shortest for Gold OA, followed by non-OA, and longest for Green OA. The prolonged retraction time for Green OA could be attributed to an atypical distribution of retraction reasons. Research limitations There is no exploration of a wider range of OA levels, such as Hybrid OA and Bronze OA. Practical implications The outcomes of this study suggest the need for increased attention to research integrity within the OA publications. The occurrences of falsification, manipulation, and ethical concerns within Green OA publications warrant attention from the scientific community. Originality/value This study contributes to the understanding of research integrity in the realm of OA publications, shedding light on retraction patterns and reasons across different OA levels.

Investigation on Regional Recognition of Open Access Journals

Openness and Knowledge Sharing of Economics,Sociology,Law and Politics:A Comparative Study on Citations of Chinese Social Science Journals

A Comparative Analysis of Publication Portfolios of Selected Economies.

Regional Analysis on Chinese Scientific Output

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

An Analysis of the International Academic Influence of Academic Journals in China over the Three Decades Since Reform and Opening Up

Analysis on the Dilemma and Strategy of Open Access in China

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Submission Preference Of Economics And Management Discipline In Open Access Era-Investigation From Web Of Science

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Quantitative Analysis of Articles on Open Access in China during 2004 and 2007

The Current State of Open Access in Journals Sponsored by the China Association for Science and Technology

Behavior Characteristics of International Academic Journal Publishers in Response to Open Science:A Case Study of Five Major International Academic Journal Publishers

A Comparative Study on Characteristics of Retracted Publications Across Different Open Access Levels

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

The Present State and Future Development of Open Access Publishing for Journals Sponsored by China Association for Science and Technology

The Survey of SCI Publication by Scientists Working in China in 2005

A Discussion of Measuring the Top-1% Most-Highly-Cited Publications: the Case of China

Tracing Scientific Outputs in the Osteoarthritis Research Field in China Based on Publications in the Web of Science

On the Journals Publishing Modes and Their Access Under the Open Access Environment