Nonstoichiometry and Defects in Hydrothermally Synthesized epsilon-LiVOPO4

Youngmin Chung,Ellen Cassidy,Krystal Lee,Carrie Siu,Yiqing Huang,Fredrick Omenya,Jatinkumar Rana,Kamila M. Wiaderek,Natasha A. Chernova,Karena W. Chapman,Louis F. J. Piper,M. Stanley Whittingham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b00448
IF: 6.4
2019-01-01
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Abstract:epsilon-LiVOPO4 has been synthesized through the hydro thermal method by adjusting the pH of the hydrothermal solution and the reaction temperature. This phase is formed between 180 and 220 degrees C, as diamond-like crystals around 10-15 mu m in size. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis shows that hydrothermal epsilon-LiVOPO4 lattice parameters a and b linearly decrease, while c linearly increases when the synthesis temperature increases. Thermogravimetric analysis with mass spectroscopy reveals 1.5 to 0.5% water loss at about 350 degrees C for epsilon-LiVOPO4 synthesized at 180 and 220 degrees C, suggesting water or protons incorporation into the structure. Magnetic studies reveal ferrimagnetism in hydrothermal epsilon-LiVOPO4 below 10 K, as opposed to antiferromagnetic ordering below 14 K found in samples synthesized at high temperature. In-situ XRD upon heating of the hydrothermal epsilon-LiVOPO4 synthesized at 180, 200, and 220 degrees C reveals that the temperature dependences of their lattice parameters merge at about 500 degrees C; furthermore, at the same temperature the structure reversibly changes from triclinic to monoclinic. The lattice parameters and the magnetic properties of the hydrothermal samples heated to 750 degrees C are similar to those of solid-state synthesized epsilon-LiVOPO4. Based on structure and composition analysis, we suggest that hydrothermal samples can be described as an epsilon-Li1+xHyV1-zOPO4 (x, y, z < 0.1) solid solution. The electrochemical characterization of hydrothermal epsilon-LiVOPO4 reveals the first cycle capacity of about 300 mAh/g, which holds for about five cycles, gradually decreasing thereafter. The low voltage region does not reveal voltage plateaus corresponding to Li1.5VOPO4 and Li1.75VOPO4 phases found in the solid-state material, further suggesting structural disorder in the low-temperature samples evidenced from the lattice parameters and the magnetic properties.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?