Mortality and failure‐to‐rescue after esophagectomy in the procedure‐targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry

Larkin B. Harris,Vanessa Vyas,Katy Marino,Allison Wells,Hanna K. Jensen,Michail N. Mavros
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12297
IF: 3.282
2024-07-25
World Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Background The association between procedural volume and esophagectomy outcomes has been established, but the relationship between higher levels of care and esophagectomy outcomes has not been explored. This study aims to investigate whether hospital participation in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) esophagectomy‐targeted registry is associated with superior outcomes. Methods The 2016–2020 ACS NSQIP standard and esophagectomy‐targeted registries were queried. Esophagectomy outcomes were analyzed overall and stratified by esophagectomy type (Ivor Lewis vs. transhiatal vs. 3‐field McKeown). Results A total of 2181 and 5449 esophagectomy cases were identified in the standard and targeted databases (68% Ivor Lewis esophagectomy). The median age was 65 years and 80% were male. Preoperative characteristics were largely comparable. On univariate analysis, targeted hospitals were associated with lower mortality (2% vs. 4%, p
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?