Impact of the thresholds of surgical volume on mortality in oncological digestive surgery: A French National Cohort

Romain Jaquet,Alexandre Challine,Stylianos Tzedakis,Charles de Ponthaud,Sandrine Katsahian,Jérémie Lefevre,Andrea Lazzati
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108581
Abstract:Objective: To report the 90-day mortality benefit associated with the implementation of the new regulatory reform on oncological surgical digestive authorizations. Summary background data: New thresholds in digestive cancer surgery were applied in 2023, accrediting centers for major interventions. No evidence has been provided to support their justification. Methods: Any French adult operated for digestive cancer from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 was included from the PMSI. A 90-day mortality logistic regression was performed by adjusting by age, sex, Charlson score, Frailty index, hospital-volume (<5 or ≥5 interventions/year), emergency intervention, specialty. Results: 143,582 patients were identified. Of these, 64,268 underwent surgery of one of the subspecialties subject to the new thresholds (stomach N = 8283, liver N = 18,668, pancreas N = 11,220, esophagus N = 3704, rectum N = 22,393). 4808 (7.5 %) patients underwent surgery in low-volume centers, distributed as follows: stomach 1757/8283 (22.94 %), liver 970/18,668 (5.19 %), pancreas 895/11,220 (7.98 %), esophagus 672/3704 (18.14 %) and rectum 514/22,393 (2.29 %). In univariate analysis, the 90-day mortality rate was significantly lower in high-volume centers, for all subspecialties, gastric: 127/1757 (7.23 %) vs 330/6526 (5.06 %), p = 0.0004, hepatic: 64/970 (6.6 %) vs 824/17,698 (4.66 %), p = 0.006, pancreatic: 74/895 (8, 27 %) vs 608/10,325 (5.89 %), p = 0.004, esophageal: 58/672 (8.63 %) vs 195/3032 (6.43 %), p = 0.04, rectal 26/514 (5.06 %) vs 639/21,879 (2.92 %), p = 0.005. The multivariate analysis, showed a mortality reduction for high-volume centers: OR = 0.78 CI95[0.71-0.87], p < 0.001. Conclusion: The recent implementation of regulatory decrees appears to be justified. The enforcement of these hospital volume thresholds is likely to contribute to a reduction in postoperative mortality following digestive cancer surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?