In-beam PET treatment monitoring of carbon therapy patients: Results of a clinical trial at CNAO
Aafke Christine Kraan,Filippo Susini,Martina Moglioni,Giuseppe Battistoni,Davide Bersani,Pietro Carra,Piergiorgio Cerello,Angelica De Gregorio,Veronica Ferrero,Elisa Fiorina,Gaia Franciosini,Matteo Morrocchi,Silvia Muraro,Vincenzo Patera,Francesco Pennazio,Alessandra Retico,Valeria Rosso,Alessio Sarti,Angelo Schiavi,Giancarlo Sportelli,Giacomo Traini,Barbara Vischioni,Viviana Vitolo,Maria Giuseppina Bisogni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104493
2024-08-12
Abstract:Purpose: Carbon ion therapy treatments can be monitored non-invasively with in-beam Positron Emission Tomography (PET). At CNAO the INSIDE in-beam PET scanner has been used in a clinical trial (NCT03662373) to monitor cancer treatments with proton and carbon therapy. In this work we present the analysis results of carbon therapy data, acquired during the first phase of the clinical trial, analyzing data of nine patients treated at CNAO for various malignant tumors in the head-and-neck region. Materials and methods: The patient group contained two patients requiring replanning, and seven patients without replanning, based on established protocols. For each patient the PET images acquired along the course of treatment were compared with a reference, applying two analysis methods: the beam-eye-view (BEV) method and the γ-index analysis. Time trends in several parameters were investigated, as well as the agreement with control CTs, if available. Results: Regarding the BEV-method, the average sigma value σ was 3.7 mm of range difference distributions for patients without changes (sensitivity of the INSIDE detector). The 3D-information obtained from the BEV analysis was partly in agreement with what was observed in the control CT. The data quality and quantity was insufficient for a definite interpretation of the time trends. Conclusion: We analyzed carbon therapy data acquired with the INSIDE in-beam PET detector using two analysis methods. The data allowed to evaluate sensitivity of the INSIDE detector for carbon therapy and to make several recommendations for the future.