Abstract:Objective: To compare aortic annular diameter measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) in patients with severe aortic stenosis, and to evaluate the impact on selection of prosthetic valve type in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: Clinical data of 138 patients with severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVI between January 2014 and June 2016 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed.The difference of aortic annular diameter measured by TTE, TEE, and MSCT were compared.TTE was performed after TAVI to evaluate the accuracy of measurement before TAVI. Results: (1) Aortic annular diameter was (23.37±2.22) mm by TTE and (23.52±1.70) mm by TEE (P=0.12). Pearson correlation analysis showed that aortic annular diameter measured by TTE was correlated to that measured by TEE (r=0.87, P<0.05). (2)The long-axis diameter and the short-axis diameter measured by MSCT multiplanar reconstruction were significantly different ((27.86±2.87) mm vs. (21.91±2.53) mm, P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the mean of the long- and short-axis diameters and the diameter derived from cross-sectional area by MSCT ((24.92±2.38) mm vs. (24.84±2.25) mm, P=0.08). However, the diameter derived from the circumference ((25.35±2.34) mm) was significantly larger than the mean of the long- and short-axis diameters and the diameter derived from cross-sectional area by MSCT, and the difference were (0.43±0.62) mm and (0.51±0.62) mm respectively(both P<0.05). (3) Measurements of the aortic annulus diameter by MSCT including the mean of the long- and short-axis diameters, diameter derived from cross-sectional area, and diameter derived from the circumference were larger than the measurement by TTE and TTE (all P<0.05). (4) Implantation was successful in all patients.Moderate to severe paravalvular leakage was detected in 3 patients at 7 days post TAVI, and 1 patient developed severe prosthetic valve restenosis at 6 months post TAVI and received valve-in-valve implantation. Conclusions: In severe aortic stenosis patients referred for TAVI, the aortic annular diameter derived from TTE and TEE measurements are smaller than that from MSCT.In the absence of a gold standard, selection of prosthetic valve type in TAVI procedure should rely on comprehensive considerations, which is of importance to get good clinical results for severe aortic stenosis patients underwent TAVI.

Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography measurement of mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis: multiplanar reconstruction or 3D direct planimetry?

Utility of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Intraoperative Assessment of Mltral Valve Repair

Clinical values of intraoperative real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for surgery in patients with mitral valve prolapse

Comparison of Aortic Annulus Dimensions by Multimodal Measurement Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

[Comparison of Aortic Annular Diameter Defined by Different Measurement Mordalities Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation].

Comparison of accuracy of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis by real-time, three-dimensional echocardiography versus two-dimensional echocardiography versus Doppler pressure half-time.

Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography evaluation of mitral valve area of patient with rheumatic mitral stenosis

Comparison of the effective orifice area of prosthetic mitral valves using two-dimensional versus three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Two-dimensional transthoracic measure of mitral annulus in mitral valve prolapse and moderate to severe regurgitation: a method comparison analysis with three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Preliminary study of real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry of the mitral valve area before and after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty

Mitral valvuloplasty using real‐time three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Evaluation of a Novel Echocardiographic Three-Dimensional Automated Software for the Assessment of the Aortic Root in Candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Level of agreement between three-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for mitral annulus evaluation: A feasibility and comparison study

Evaluation the Alteration of Mitral Valve Structures in Functional Mitral Regurgitation Using Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography

Novel 3-dimensional effective regurgitation orifice area quantification serves as a reliable tool to identify severe mitral valve regurgitation

Aortic Valve Planimetry in Aortic Stenosis Quantification: Reliability of Three-Dimensional-Multiplane Reconstruction and Comparison With Established Methods

Impact of Net Atrioventricular Compliance on Mitral Valve Area Assessment-A Perspective Considering Three-Dimensional Mitral Valve Area by Transesophageal Echocardiography

Mitral valve morphology assessment: three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography versus computed tomography

Assessment of function on left atrial and biventricular in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis before and after percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography

0338: Comparative Value of 3D and Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Pre-Surgical Assessment of Patients with Mitral Regurgitation

Assessment of left atrial function in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography