Research for PET imaging divided by time-based and amplitude-based respiratory gating

苏畅,王瞳,邢海群,霍力,李方,张辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2017.03.001
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) respiratory gating based on time and amplitude to improve the reconstructed image artifacts.Methods:Two respiratory gating methods were compared based on 8 clinical patients data, equal intervals of time division method time-based gating and equal data division method variable amplitude-based gating, the maximum displacement, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and gross tumor volume were used to quantitatively evaluate these two methods. Independent-t test was used to test whether the difference between two methods were significant for SUVmax and gross tumor volume.Results: For patient data involving heart, amplitude-based method detected 24.47% more motion signal which related to maximum displacement than time-based method. For patient data involving lung lesions, SUVmax derived from amplitude-based method could be recovered to a higher value (9.92% more than time-based method), and 40% (4/10) of the patient data results were statistically significant (t=-3.805,t=-9.099,t=-2.817,t=-2.315,P<0.05). Gross tumor volume calculated from amplitude-based method could be 29.13% less than time-based method, and the differences were statistical significant(t=2.262,t=10.382,t=2.922,t=2.762,t=2.858,P<0.05), besides the percentage of patient data was 50% (5/10).Conclusion:Amplitude-based method can extract more motion information, at the same time, signal to noise ratio values of different phases' images are similar to each other.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?