Abstract:(Tel: +44 1482 466464; Email: c.wu@hull.ac.uk) 9 d Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK 10 e Biorenewables Development Centre, The Biocentre, York Science Park, York, UK YO10 5NY 11 12 Abstract: Thermal-chemical processing of biomass is expected to provide renewable and clean 13 energy and fuels in the future. Due to the nature of endothermic reactions, microwave and 14 conventional heating have been applied to this technology. However, more studies need to be 15 carried out to clarify the difference between these two heating technologies. In this work, we 16 investigated two bio-char samples produced from conventional pyrolysis of wood biomass (yield of 17 bio-char: 38.48 and 59.70 wt.%, respectively) and one bio-char produced from microwave 18 pyrolysis with a yield of 45.16 wt.% from the same biomass sample at different process conditions. 19 Various methodologies have been used to characterise the bio-chars. CO2 gasification of bio-char 20 has also been studied using a thermogravimetric analyser (TGA) and a fixed-bed reaction system. 21 The results show that volatile and carbon contents of the bio-char derived from microwave 22 pyrolysis were between the two conventional bio-chars. However, the microwave bio-char is more 23 reactive for CO2 gasification, as more CO was released during TGA experiments, and the CO 24 release peak was narrower compared with the CO2 gasification of the conventional bio-chars. It is 25 suggested that the conventional bio-char is less reactive due to the presence of more secondary 26 chars which are produced from secondary reactions of volatiles during the conventional biomass 27 pyrolysis. While the microwave pyrolysis generates more uniform bio-chars with less secondary 28 char, and therefore, has advantages of producing bio-char for downstream char gasification. 29 30

CO 2 gasification of biochar derived from conventional and 1 microwave pyrolysis 2