Abstract:Ecosystem services and biodiversity are frequently measured by field-scale indicators. Yet, many important agricultural and economic drivers as well as agri-environmental policies operate at larger sales, to which field-scale indicators first need to be upscaled. Therefore, this perspective is focussed on upscaling approaches from field to farm or to landscape scale. To understand how ecosystem services and biodiversity are affected by farm-scale drivers and to inform future decision- and policy-making while exploiting existing data sources, these need to be upscaled and analysed at farm scale. However, how this is done best for different types of indicators for ecosystems services and biodiversity received little attention so far. In this work, we propose and discuss different options for upscaling ecosystem service and biodiversity indicators from field to farm scale. We base our novel conceptual work on a large body of literature and demonstrate that before deciding on an upscaling approach, different aspects of the indicators and the purpose of the assessment need to be considered. Our propositions start at the point where field-scale data is available for aggregation at farm scale. Such an aggregation needs to consider the relationship between ecosystem service supply and the benefit provided, i.e., the supply-benefit relationship, which describes how a change in supply affects the resulting benefit for farmers and/or society. We argue that this relationship can also be conceptualized for biodiversity, with benefit being the value of a field or farm for biodiversity conservation. Because benefit does often not continuously increase with supply, but can exhibit breaking points defined by thresholds in supply, the shape of the supply-benefit relationship varies among different ecosystem services and biodiversity components. For example, for upscaling biodiversity indicators, a conservation value needs to consider that conservation benefit might non-linearly change with supply, i.e., habitat quality and quantity, and becomes marginal below certain thresholds. Only when such potential thresholds are considered, a suitable upscaling approach can be chosen from the approaches that we present in this work. While some indicators can be upscaled using a simple area-weighted total or average, for others, thresholds in supply are of great relevance for determining the best upscaling approach. We conclude that upscaling indicators to the farm scale holds untapped potential to inform agri-environmental assessments and future policies. By presenting and discussing suitable approaches for different types of indicators, we hope to facilitate upscaling as a tool to support agri-environmental decision-making in the future.

Dissemination level : Final report Title : Methodological framework for upscaling and integrat ing bottom-up approaches for European analysis and assessment of the impacts , costs and benefits of climate adaptation Summary

EU-wide Economic Valuation of Adaptation to Climate Change

Report on the model developments in the sectoral assessments: Deliverable D. 3.2.(grant agreement 308337)

Regionalization Of Socio-Economic Scenarios And Adaptation Options For The Guanting Basin

Harmonizing the Development of Local Socioeconomic Scenarios: A Participatory Downscaling Approach Applied in Four European Case Studies

A multi-hazard regional level impact assessment for Europe combining indicators of climatic and non-climatic change

Modelling the impact land use change on flood risk: Umia (Spain) and Voglajna (Slovenia) case studies

Integrated drought risk assessment to support adaptive policy making in the Netherlands

A Simplified Water Accounting Procedure to Assess Climate Change Impact on Water Resources for Agriculture across Different European River Basins

Climate adaptation guidance: New roles for hydroeconomic analysis

Upscaling of ecosystem service and biodiversity indicators from field to farm to inform agri-environmental decision- and policy-making

Climate change and ecological assessment in Europe under the WFD - Hitting moving targets with shifting baselines?

Determining sectoral and regional sensitivity to climate and socio-economic change in Europe using impact response surfaces

National mapping and assessment of ecosystem services projects in Europe – Participants' experiences, state of the art and lessons learned

Cross-scale and integrative prioritization of multi-functionality in large river floodplains

Greenhouse Gas Abatement in EUROPE—A Scenario-Based, Bottom-Up Analysis Showing the Effect of Deep Emission Mitigation on the European Energy System

Adaptation strategies for water supply management in a drought prone Mediterranean river basin: Application of outranking method

Coping with Urban & Agriculture Water Demand Uncertainty in Water Management Plan Design: the Interest of Participatory Scenario Analysis

Pluvial flood adaptation using nature-based solutions: An integrated biophysical-economic assessment

Downscaling Global Land-Use Scenario Data to the National Level: A Case Study for Belgium

Resilient agriculture: water management for climate change adaptation in Lower Saxony