Abstract:Integrated assessment models (IAMs) are a central tool for the quantitative analysis of climate change mitigation strategies. However, due to their global, cross-sectoral and centennial scope, IAMs cannot explicitly represent the temporal and spatial details required to properly analyze the key role of variable renewable energy (VRE) in decarbonizing the power sector and enabling emission reductions through end-use electrification. In contrast, power sector models (PSMs) can incorporate high spatiotemporal resolutions but tend to have narrower sectoral and geographic scopes and shorter time horizons. To overcome these limitations, here we present a novel methodology: an iterative and fully automated soft-coupling framework that combines the strengths of a long-term IAM and a detailed PSM. The key innovation is that the framework uses the market values of power generations and the capture prices of demand flexibilities in the PSM as price signals that change the capacity and power mix of the IAM. Hence, both models make endogenous investment decisions, leading to a joint solution. We apply the method to Germany in a proof-of-concept study using the IAM REgional Model of INvestments and Development (REMIND) v3.0.0 and the PSM Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables (DIETER) v1.0.2 and confirm the theoretical prediction of almost-full convergence in terms of both decision variables and (shadow) prices. At the end of the iterative process, the absolute model difference between the generation shares of any generator type for any year is < 5 % for a simple configuration (no storage, no flexible demand) under a "proof-of-concept" baseline scenario and 6 %–7 % for a more realistic and detailed configuration (with storage and flexible demand). For the simple configuration, we mathematically show that this coupling scheme corresponds uniquely to an iterative mapping of the Lagrangians of two power sector optimization problems of different time resolutions, which can lead to a comprehensive model convergence of both decision variables and (shadow) prices. The remaining differences in the two models can be explained by a slight mismatch between the standing capacities in the real world and optimal modeling solutions based purely on cost competition. Since our approach is based on fundamental economic principles, it is also applicable to other IAM–PSM pairs.

Report on the model developments in the sectoral assessments: Deliverable D. 3.2.(grant agreement 308337)

EU-wide Economic Valuation of Adaptation to Climate Change

Dissemination level : Final report Title : Methodological framework for upscaling and integrat ing bottom-up approaches for European analysis and assessment of the impacts , costs and benefits of climate adaptation Summary

Determining sectoral and regional sensitivity to climate and socio-economic change in Europe using impact response surfaces

Scenario Setup and Forcing Data for Impact Model Evaluation and Impact Attribution Within the Third Round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (Isimip3a)

Environmental impact assessment for climate change policy with the simulation-based integrated assessment model E3ME-FTT-GENIE

Adapting to climate change: an integrated biophysical and economic assessment for Mozambique

DEPLOYERS: An agent based modeling tool for multi country real world data

Bidirectional coupling of a long-term integrated assessment model REMIND v3.0.0 with an hourly power sector model DIETER v1.0.2

Bidirectional coupling of the long-term integrated assessment model REgional Model of INvestments and Development (REMIND) v3.0.0 with the hourly power sector model Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables (DIETER) v1.0.2

Integrated environmental-economic modelling for cross sectoral water policy evaluation

IBPSA Project 1: BIM/GIS and Modelica framework for building and community energy system design and operation – ongoing developments, lessons learned and challenges

Environmental performance of eco‐design strategies applied to the building sector

Supplementary Data Bastos Et Al. ESD (2021)

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for probabilistic weather and climate-risk modelling: an implementation in CLIMADA v.3.1.0

COP21: Results and Implications for Pathways and Policies for Low Emissions European Societies

A coupled agent-based model for France for simulating adaptation and migration decisions under future coastal flood risk

Climate adaptation guidance: New roles for hydroeconomic analysis

MEDEAS-World model calibration for the study of the energy transition

System Integration of Wind and Solar Power in Integrated Assessment Models: A Cross-Model Evaluation of New Approaches

Assessing the Impacts of 1.5 °C Global Warming – Simulation Protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (Isimip2b)