Abstract:This paper systematically investigated the effect of flow rate ratios between the water and oil phases, and concentrations of sodium alginate within the water phase, on the generation of droplets and capsules in a microfluidic reactor in order to facilitate artificial cell production within the water phase for biological experiments. Artificial cells, which simulate the processes that occur within organisms in vitro without the use of real tissues, can be made within flow focusing microfluidic chips. However, researchers must first fine tune the systems in which they are made in order for these cells to be generated. These tests will help make artificial cells more efficient to fabricate within microfluidic systems. Droplets were formed by the emulsification of water in a continuous oil phase. Capsules were formed through a reaction of sodium alginate, carried in the water phase, and calcium ions, carried in the oil phase, to create a cross-linked membrane of calcium alginate surrounding a droplet. An increase in the flow rate of water had a positive correlation on the size of the droplets created, and an increase in the flow rate of oil had a negative correlation. Changes to the flow rates of the continuous oil phase affected the system more than changes to the flow rates of the dispersive water phase. In addition, high concentrations of sodium alginate within the dispersive phase increases the stability of the droplet formation, as well as the stability of the capsules formed within the microfluidic device. Introduction Much of biological research involves describing systems and how each part functions in relation to each other and the whole. However, this approach may sometimes be very complicated on a cellular level to observe and interpret. An example of such a system is seen in biomineralization, where organisms have the ability to make minerals with both organic and inorganic properties1. These abilities allow the organisms to create tissues with many structural levels that build upon each other to create complex and stable structures2. Because of the complexities of the structural levels, it is difficult to study biomineralization processes in active, living, cells. Through artificial cells, in vivo systems, such as those involved in biomineralization, can be studied in controlled circumstances. This process will allow researchers to isolate specific aspects which they wish to study, instead of only being able to look at the process as a whole. One way to produce these artificial cells is through the use of microfluidic reactors. Microfluidics is a recent technology that creates micro-size environments in which chemical or biological Droplet Generation in Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Devices for the Creation of Artificial Cells Weilong Li1,3, Teresa Petralli-Mallow2, and Zhihong Nie4 Student1, Teacher2: Poolesville High School, Poolesville, Maryland, 20837 Intern3, Mentor/Assistant Professor4: University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742 *Correspondence: weilongli1@gmail.com INTERNSHIP ARTICLE experiments can take place3. Artificial cells can be created in a microfluidic reactor by manipulating the flow rates of oil and water inside the chip to create water in oil droplets that have characteristics of biological cells, such as DNA, RNA, and proteins, which are included in the water phase, and lipids, which are included in the oil phase4. Because microfluidics is a newer method of conducting research, less is known about how to conduct experiments using this technology than other, more conventional research methods. Therefore, investigation into how droplets form and behave within a chip is necessary for conducting experiments that involve microfluidics, in order to help researchers understand what to expect when running an experiment and how to run experiments more efficiently. In this paper we will show experimentally the nature of droplet formation in relation to flow rates within a microfluidic reactor, as well as the relationships between the concentrations of reactants to form capsules with cross-linked polymer membranes. 24 Materials and Methods Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (Sylgard 184) was obtained as a two-part base and curing agent set from Dow Corning. Sodium alginate, octadecyltrichlorosilane, calcium acetate, sorbitane monooleate (Span 80), soybean oil and mineral oil were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Oxygen plasma was generated using a plasma cleaner (PDC-32G) from Harrick Plasma. Syringe pumps (NE-1000) were from New Era Pump Systems. SU-8, an epoxybased photoresist polymer) master silicon wafer templates were provided pre-made by the laboratory. Images were monitored using NIS-Elements software and taken using a Nikon optical microscope equipped with a CCD camera.The PDMS polymer base and curing agent were mixed in a 10:1 ratio by weight. The mixture was then degassed in a vacuum chamber at room temperature until the mixture was clear of bubbles. The degassed mixture was then poured into a SU-8 master template and put into an oven at 75o C and left to solidify for 4 hours. A separate PDMS substrate was produced in the same way, using a sterile petri dish instead of a template. The solidified PDMS chip was cut out of the master, and the substrate cut out of the petri dish. Holes were then punched through the inlets and outlets of the chip. The chip and substrate were then subjected to an oxygen plasma treatment and pressed together to bond as described by Duffy et al.5. The edges of the substrate were adjusted to limit the chance of the substrate from peeling off from the chip. The chip was then placed back into the oven at 75oC until needed (Figure 1). Weilong Li, Teresa Petralli-Mallow, and Zhihong Nie Page 2 of 5 25 Figure 1. The fabrication of a microfluidic reactor: a) Pouring PDMS mixture into SU-8 master. b) Cutting out PDMS chip from master. c) Inlet holes being punched into the chip. d) PDMS chip on right, substrate on left. e) Chip and substrate placed into the plasma cleaner to be treated with oxygen plasma. f) The final completely bonded chip. Figure 3. Optical microscope image of continuous droplet generation from a microfluidic device. Octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) vapor was introduced into the PDMS device through a vapor-phase deposition system as shown in Figure 2. The PDMS device was placed on a hot plate at 70o C for 45 minutes while hydrolysis of OTS vapor created a thin film around the inner surface the microchannels within the chip. The device was then removed from the system and placed back into the oven. A solution of mineral oil and 0.4 (wt./wt.)% Span 80, a surfactant, was introduced from two side channels as the continuous phase (CP), while deionized water (DIW) was injected into the central channel as the dispersive phase (DP). The two liquids were forced through a narrow orifice of the microfluidic device using syringe pumps. Under the shear force of CP, the DP elongated and broke up into monodispersed droplets. The CP carried the droplets flowing in the downstream channel of the microfluidic device. The flow rates were adjusted accordingly to tune the size and size distribution of droplets (Figure 3). Flow rates of 1.8 ml/hr and 1.5 μl/min were used for the CP and DP respectively. The continuous flow rate (CFR) was reduced to 0.18 mL/hr and images were taken at 0.178 mL/hr increments up to a maximum of 3.56 mL/hr, with a constant dispersive flow rate (DFR) of 1.5 μL/min. The same was done with the DFR, from 0.5 μL/min to 2.5 μL/min with 0.1 μL/ min increments at a constant CFR of 1.78 mL/hr. The four droplets from each change in phase were measured for diameter, and the average diameter and variance for each flow rate were calculated. The average diameters were plotted on a flow rate vs. diameter plot, and the average variance was calculated. Two monomer mixtures, 0.6 (wt./wt.)% and 1 (wt./wt.)% sodium alginate in DIW were prepared and used as the DP, with oil as the CP. The DP rates for the 0.6% mixture were increased to between 3 μL/min to 5 μL/min to compensate for the increase in viscosity. However, the increments were kept at 0.1 μL/min. Similarly, the rates for the 1% mixture increased to between 5 μL/min and 7 μL/min, again with 0.1 μL/min increments. Images were taken again for every flow rate, and average diameter was plotted against DIW droplets. Average variance was also calculated for each concentration of sodium alginate. A mixture of 1.5% Span 80 and 3% calcium acetate (C4H6O4Ca) in soybean oil by weight was prepared and used as the CP. In addition, three solutions of sodium alginate (NaC6H7O6) in DIW were prepared, at 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% by weight. Each mixture of sodium alginate was used as the DP, and the soybean oil mixture was used as the continuous phase. Capsules were created in the same way as droplets, with adjustments to stabilize droplet formation. The 0.5% sodium alginate mixture stabilized around a CFR of 1.78 mL/hr, and a dispersive rate of 2 μL/min. The 1% solution stabilized around a CFR of 4.27 mL/hr and a dispersive of 1.5 μL/min, and the 1.5% solution around a CFR of 3.91 mL/hr and a dispersive of 4 μL/min. For each level of sodium alginate, images of the formation of capsules with calcium alginate surfaces were taken, and the capsules were then collected in a collection vial. The capsules within the vial were then viewed under a microscope and imaged once immediately after creation and once five minutes later. Figure 2. A vapor phase deposition system. Air moves in from the right through tubing to create bubbles containing octadecyltrichlorosilane vapor. The pressure in the vial pushes the vapor through the two outlet tubes into the inlets of the microfluidic chip. Weilong Li, Teresa Petralli-Mallow, and Zhihong Nie Page 3 of 5 26 Results At each flow rate increment, four droplets were measured for diameter. The change in diameter between flow rates, average diameter at each flow rate, and variance at each flow rate we

Abstract:BioTechniquesVol. 68, No. 3 Expert OpinionOpen AccessStep emulsification: high-throughput production of monodisperse dropletsLinbo Liu, Nan Xiang, Zhonghua Ni, Xing Huang, Juanjuan Zheng, Yunhua Wang & Xingcai ZhangLinbo LiuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, & Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Design & Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical Instruments, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, ChinaJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USASearch for more papers by this author, Nan XiangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, & Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Design & Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical Instruments, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Zhonghua NiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, & Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Design & Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical Instruments, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Xing HuangJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USASearch for more papers by this author, Juanjuan ZhengJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USASearch for more papers by this author, Yunhua WangJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USASearch for more papers by this author & Xingcai Zhang*Author for correspondence: E-mail Address: xingcai@seas.harvard.eduJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USASearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:24 Jan 2020https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2019-0134AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Keywords: high throughputmicrochannel arraysmicrofluidicsmonodisperse dropletsspontaneous transformationstep emulsificationStep emulsification is a promising method for the production of monodisperse droplets. Its main advantage is that its geometry allows massive parallelization of multiple nozzles to achieve high-throughput production of droplets. As the droplet generation process in step emulsification is mainly driven by interfacial tension rather than high energy shear stress systems, the droplet size is independent of the flow rates of both the continuous and the dispersed phases. Therefore, the high productivity of droplets (>100 l/h) and an excellent diameter coefficient of variation (<5%) can be guaranteed simultaneously, which makes step emulsification a potential tool for real industrial applications. This article provides an overview of step emulsification and discusses the existing challenges that can potentially impact the practical use of this tool; it concludes with perspectives and potential applications.Step emulsificationThe step emulsification was first proposed by Kawakatsu et al. in 1997 [1]. It is a droplet microfluidics technique that offers the detection and precise control of two incompatible fluids at the microscale. Step emulsification can produce monodispersed emulsion droplets, ranging from the submicron range to around 1000 μm [2,3], with a small coefficient of variation (CV). The use of the monodispersed emulsion droplets expands the applications of medicine [4], biotechnology [5–7] and biology [8,9]. Monodispersed droplets are also applied in the food [10], cosmetics [11] and chemical industries [12]. The CV of droplets is typically <5% in many step emulsification studies as the standard CV [13–15]. Using droplets with a small CV as miniature test tubes can improve the standardization and predictability of assays and increase the signal-to-noise ratio. Another merit of step emulsification is that it is relatively easy to parallelize to produce uniform droplets with high throughput [16–18]. At this time, a variety of encapsulated products can be produced using step emulsification, ranging from single to multiple emulsions, microcapsules, microspheres and many others [10,19–21].Droplet generation in step emulsificationIn step emulsification, droplets are generated by the spontaneous transformation of an oil–water interface [22], with the flow of the dispersed phase into the continuous phase through a rectangular microchannel [16–23], as shown in Figure 1. Microchannel arrays have been fabricated on a variety of substrates, such as a silicon-on-insulator and single silicon crystal, owing to the surface properties that can easily be modified using hydrophilic and hydrophobic treatments [24]. Microchannel arrays can also be produced with materials such as borosilicate glass, expanding the applicability to chemically aggressive fluids [17,25,26]. Because of the spontaneous droplet generation process, step emulsification is highly energy efficient, with typical energy input. However, the mild droplet generation in step emulsification, with no involvement of energy, makes it a preferable system to prevent denaturation of sensitive bioactive compounds [10,27]. Because the droplet generation process in step emulsification is mainly driven by interfacial tension, rather than high-energy shear stress systems, the droplet size is independent of the flow rates of both the continuous and the dispersed phases [14,28]. Therefore, there is no requirement for expensive gas regulators or precision pumps for preparing a monodispersed emulsion. The step emulsification devices can even be operated by manual injection of the dispersed phase to produce droplets with a small CV. Moreover, there are numerous papers on step emulsification with varied nozzle type and geometry. These nozzle variations significantly influence the degree and type of droplet size dependency on parameters such as volume flow rate. Although in most cases the mechanism of the droplet breakup itself is independent of dispersing and continuous volume flows, the droplet size can be influenced by the disperse flow rate. The dependency is smaller compared with other microfluidic droplet generation methods; however, it is significant [13]. The degree of dependency varies with type and the geometry of the step (straight/trapezoid/terraced/millipede etc.) [28,29]. Because of the importance of a stable and monodispersed droplet generation for industrial applications, these phenomena must be taken into consideration when designing new microreactors.Figure 1. Step emulsification and parallelization: high-throughput production of monodisperse droplets.The droplet generation process in step emulsification has been evaluated using a variety of simulation methods such as computational fluid dynamics [30] and Lattice Boltzmann methods [31,32] and using the experimental approach with high-speed microscopy [17]. They all conclude that the nozzle height determines the maximum production rate and diameter of the monodisperse droplet in step emulsification device. Even though the nozzle height restricted the maximum production rate and the diameter of the droplets, numerous scientific works have already been done to address some of the challenges in increasing the production rate. Xuet al. reported a high aspect ratio (>3.5) step emulsification, which can produce 15,000 droplets per second with 2000 nozzles, with a CV below 3% [33]. Schuler et al. demonstrated a straightforward step emulsification system without any oil flow, which uses centrifugal forces to produce 500 droplets per nozzle (parallelization with 23 nozzles) with a CV between 2 and 4% [34]. Recently, Schuler et al. demonstrated a step emulsification system, which employed buoyancy in the centrifugal field to realize increased droplet generation of 2800 droplets per second and nozzle, with a CV below 5%. Droplet generation rates are about a factor eight above the critical capillary number. The main advantage is that a single nozzle is used in which manufacturing tolerances do not influence droplet generation rates [35]. Dangla et al. reported a droplet microfluidics system driven by gradients of confinement, single droplet generation as well as high throughput is demonstrated. Although the methodology is not strictly the step emulsification, the gradient confinement method is very close to it because droplet formation also depends on the geometry and very weakly on the flow rate. Droplet breakup is driven by surface tension. The only difference is that no step is employed but rather an inclined surface to change the surface energy [36]. Because of the profound engineering and scientific standards of step emulsification, to find more detailed descriptions and discussions about droplet formation mechanism, device fabrication and various applications, the reader is advised to study some of the excellent reviews and papers on the topic [37–44].Challenges & future perspectiveStep emulsification can be useful for applications that need large-scale production of monodispersed droplets or encapsulating perishable samples. Despite the many compelling developments, there remains effort that needs to be put into bringing step emulsification out of the laboratory as an industrialized technology. First, researchers should focus on the basic research of step emulsification. Although droplet breakup dynamics have been explored [13], to our knowledge, no model exists to figure out precisely the diameter of droplets. More in-depth investigations of the relationship between droplet diameter and other parameters (flow rate, viscosity, microchannel geometry and temperature) are still expected. Second, mass production is a crucial issue. To lower the cost and to improve the throughput of the device simultaneously, the materials and the bonding approaches of the layers should be explored and prudently selected. Third, the nanodroplets (diameter of the droplet is nanoscale) can be used as small containers that will encapsulate one molecule per droplet, forming a high-throughput robust tool for single molecular studies. Fourth, step emulsification should not be separated from biomedical research, such as drug delivery [45], biomedical imaging [46,47], bioregeneration [48,49] and biosensing [50,51]. It can make full use of the advantage of high throughput when the functional biomaterials are encapsulated in droplets by step emulsification. Additionally, they can be integrated to synergetically promote real industrial applications, especially in the biomedical field. Therefore, more collaborative effort is still needed from researchers and entrepreneurs to achieve industrial-level high-throughput production of nanodroplet emulsions. We hope this article will stimulate researchers from different backgrounds to work on addressing the problems described previously and to make contributions to push step emulsification forward to become a robust industrial technology.Author contributionsX Zhang and L Liu conceived and wrote the paper. N Xiang, Z Ni and X Huang provided the related references. J Zheng and Y Wang provided constructive discussions for the challenges and perspective section. X Zhang approved the final version of the manuscript.Financial & competing interests disclosureThe authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.Open accessThis work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/References1. Kawakatsu T, Kikuchi Y, Nakajima M. Regular-sized cell creation in microchannel emulsification by visual microprocessing method. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 74(3), 317–321 (1997).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar2. Shui L, van den Berg A, Eijkel JC. Scalable attoliter monodisperse droplet formation using multiphase nano-microfluidics. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 11(1), 87–92 (2011).Crossref, Google Scholar3. Stolovicki E, Ziblat R, Weitz DA. Throughput enhancement of parallel step emulsifier devices by shear-free and efficient nozzle clearance. Lab Chip 18(1), 132–138 (2018).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar4. Chang TM. Semipermeable microcapsules. Science 146(3643), 524–525 (1964).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar5. Mastrobattista E, Taly V, Chanudet E et al. High-throughput screening of enzyme libraries: in vitro evolution of a β-galactosidase by fluorescence-activated sorting of double emulsions. Chem. Biol. 12(12), 1291–1300 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6. Zhang Q, Zhang X, Zhang X et al. A feedback-controlling digital microfluidic fluorimetric sensor device for simple and rapid detection of mercury (II) in coastal seawater. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 144, 20–27 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7. Han S, Zhang Q, Zhang X et al. A digital microfluidic diluter-based microalgal motion biosensor for marine pollution monitoring. Biosens. Bioelectron. 143, 111597 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar8. Lederberg J. A simple method for isolating individual microbes. J. Bacteriol. 68(2), 258 (1954).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar9. Nossal GJ. Antibody production by single cells. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 39(5), 544 (1958).Medline, CAS, Google Scholar10. Maan AA, Schroën K, Boom R. Spontaneous droplet formation techniques for monodisperse emulsions preparation-perspectives for food applications. J. Food Eng. 107(3–4), 334–346 (2011).Crossref, Google Scholar11. Pavlačková J, Egner P, Polašková J et al. Transdermal absorption of active substances from cosmetic vehicles. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 18(5), 1410–1415 (2019).Crossref, Google Scholar12. Sathyan A, Yang Z, Bai Y et al. Smart droplets: simultaneous “clean-and-repair” of surfaces using smart droplets. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29(5), 1970026 (2019).Crossref, Google Scholar13. Dangla R, Fradet E, Lopez Y et al. The physical mechanisms of step emulsification. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46(11), 114003 (2013).Crossref, Google Scholar14. Sugiura S, Nakajima M, Kumazawa N et al. Characterization of spontaneous transformation-based droplet formation during microchannel emulsification. J. Phys. Chem. B 106(36), 9405–9409 (2002).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar15. Kobayashi I, Neves MA, Wada Y et al. Large microchannel emulsification device for producing monodisperse fine droplets. Procedia Food Sci. 1, 109–115 (2011).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar16. Vladisavljević GT, Kobayashi I, Nakajima M. Production of uniform droplets using membrane, microchannel and microfluidic emulsification devices. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 13(1), 151–178 (2012).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar17. Ofner A, Moore DG, Rühs PA et al. High-throughput step emulsification for the production of functional materials using a glass microfluidic device. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 218(2), 1600472 (2017).Crossref, Google Scholar18. Li Z, Leshansky AM, Pismen LM et al. Step-emulsification in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip 15(4), 1023–1031 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar19. Neethirajan S, Kobayashi I, Nakajima M et al. Microfluidics for food, agriculture and biosystems industries. Lab Chip 11(9), 1574–1586 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar20. Vladisavljević GT, Khalid N, Neves MA et al. Industrial lab-on-a-chip: design, applications and scale-up for drug discovery and delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65(11–12), 1626–1663 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar21. Wang Z, Neves MA, Kobayashi I et al. Controlling properties of micro-to nano-sized dispersions using emulsification devices. Nanotechnol. Funct. Foods 21, 69 (2015).Crossref, Google Scholar22. Sugiura S, Nakajima M, Iwamoto S et al. Interfacial tension driven monodispersed droplet formation from microfabricated channel array. Langmuir 17(18), 5562–5566 (2001).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar23. Zhang Y, Wang L. Microfluidics: fabrication, droplets, bubbles and nanofluids synthesis. In: Advances in Transport Phenomena 2010. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 171–294 (2011). Crossref, Google Scholar24. Kobayashi I, Wada Y, Hori Y et al. Microchannel emulsification using stainless-steel chips: oil droplet generation characteristics. Chem. Eng. Technol. 35(10), 1865–1871 (2012).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar25. Eberhardt A, Bošković D, Loebbecke S et al. Customized design of dcalable microfluidic droplet generators using step-emulsification methods. Chem. Eng. Technol. 42(10), 2195–2201 (2019).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar26. Eggersdorfer ML, Seybold H, Ofner A et al. Wetting controls of droplet formation in step emulsification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115(38), 9479–9484 (2018).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar27. Maan AA, Nazir A, Khan MK et al. Microfluidic emulsification in food processing. J. Food Eng. 147, 1–7 (2015).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar28. Sugiura S, Nakajima M, Tong J et al. Preparation of monodispersed solid lipid microspheres using a microchannel emulsification technique. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 227(1), 95–103 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar29. Amstad E, Chemama M, Eggersdorfer M et al. Robust scalable high throughput production of monodisperse drops. Lab Chip 16(21), 4163–4172 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar30. Kobayashi I, Vladisavljević GT, Uemura K et al. CFD analysis of microchannel emulsification: droplet generation process and size effect of asymmetric straight flow-through microchannels. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66(22), 5556–5565 (2011).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar31. van der Zwan E, Schroën K, Boom R. A geometric model for the dynamics of microchannel emulsification. Langmuir 25(13), 7320–7327 (2009).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar32. Van Dijke KC, Schroën KC, Boom RM. Microchannel emulsification: from computational fluid dynamics to predictive analytical model. Langmuir 24(18), 10107–10115 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar33. Xu X, Yuan H, Song R et al. High aspect ratio induced spontaneous generation of monodisperse picolitre droplets for digital PCR. Biomicrofluidics 12(1), 014103 (2018).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34. Schuler F, Schwemmer F, Trotter M et al. Centrifugal step emulsification applied for absolute quantification of nucleic acids by digital droplet RPA. Lab Chip 15(13), 2759–2766 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar35. Schulz M, von Stetten F, Zengerle R et al. Centrifugal step emulsification: how buoyancy enables high generation rates of monodisperse droplets. Langmuir 35(30), 9809–9815 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar36. Dangla R, Kayi SC, Baroud CN. Droplet microfluidics driven by gradients of confinement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110(3), 853–858 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar37. Li W, Zhang L, Ge X et al. Microfluidic fabrication of microparticles for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(15), 5646–5683 (2018).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar38. Baroud CN, Gallaire F, Dangla R. Dynamics of microfluidic droplets. Lab Chip 10(16), 2032–2045 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar39. Ren K, Zhou J, Wu H. Materials for microfluidic chip fabrication. Acc. Chem. Res. 46(11), 2396–2406 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar40. Chowdhury MS, Zheng W, Kumari S et al. Dendronized fluorosurfactant for highly stable water-in-fluorinated oil emulsions with minimal inter-droplet transfer of small molecules. Nat. Commun. 10, 4546 (2019).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar41. Au AK, Huynh W, Horowitz LF et al. 3D-printed microfluidics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55(12), 3862–3881 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar42. Chokkalingam V, Herminghaus S, Seemann R. Self-synchronizing pairwise production of monodisperse droplets by microfluidic step emulsification. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(25), 254101 (2008).Crossref, Google Scholar43. Eggersdorfer ML, Zheng W, Nawar S et al. Tandem emulsification for high-throughput production of double emulsions. Lab Chip 17(5), 936–942 (2017).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar44. Ren Y, Liu Z, Shum HC. Breakup dynamics and dripping-to-jetting transition in a Newtonian/shear-thinning multiphase microsystem. Lab Chip 15(1), 121–134 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar45. Zhang X, Parekh G, Guo B et al. Polyphenol and self-assembly: metal polyphenol nanonetwork for drug delivery and pharmaceutical applications. Future Drug Discov. 1(1), doi: 10.4155/fdd-2019-0001 (2019) (Epub ahead of print).Link, Google Scholar46. Parekh G, Shi Y, Zheng J et al. Nano-carriers for targeted delivery and biomedical imaging enhancement. Ther. Deliv. 9(6), 451–468 (2018).Link, CAS, Google Scholar47. Gao D, Guo X, Zhang X et al. Multifunctional phototheranostic nanomedicine for cancer imaging and treatment. Mater. Today Bio doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100035 (2019) (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar48. Li Z, Chu D, Gao Y et al. Biomimicry, biomineralization, and bioregeneration of bone using advanced three-dimensional fibrous hydroxyapatite scaffold. Mater. Today Adv. 3, 100014 (2019).Crossref, Google Scholar49. Li Z, Chu D, Chen G et al. Biocompatible and biodegradable 3D double-network fibrous scaffold for excellent cell growth. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 15, 2209–2215 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar50. Gong Z, Karandikar S, Zhang X et al. Composite nanomaterial thin film-based biosensors. Proc. IEEE Sens. doi: 10.1109/ICSENS.2010.5690979 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar51. Yang R, Gong Z, Zhang X et al. Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanocomposite microwire-based electronic biosensor fabricated by microlithography and layer-by-layer nanoassembly. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 19(12), 7591–7595 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited BySorting Gold and Sand (Silica) Using Atomic Force Microscope-Based Dielectrophoresis4 December 2021 | Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 14, No. 1Artificial intelligence-powered microfluidics for nanomedicine and materials synthesis1 January 2021 | Nanoscale, Vol. 13, No. 46A low-cost, programmable, and multi-functional droplet printing system for low copy number SARS-CoV-2 digital PCR determinationSensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Vol. 348Ca2+-supplying black phosphorus-based scaffolds fabricated with microfluidic technology for osteogenesisBioactive Materials, Vol. 6, No. 11Advances in microfluidic systems for the delivery of nutraceutical ingredientsTrends in Food Science & Technology, Vol. 116Controllable multiple mixing monodisperse droplet streams generation using wavelength-modulated disturbancesPhysics of Fluids, Vol. 33, No. 9Machine-learning micropattern manufacturingNano Today, Vol. 38Droplet-Templated Synthetic CellsMatter, Vol. 4, No. 1Functional Surfactants for Molecular Fishing, Capsule Creation, and Single-Cell Gene Expression19 June 2021 | Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 13, No. 1Microfluidic step emulsification techniques based on spontaneous transformation mechanism: A reviewJournal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 92Microenvironment-Controlled Micropatterned Microfluidic Model (MMMM) for Biomimetic In Situ Studies23 July 2020 | ACS Nano, Vol. 14, No. 8 Vol. 68, No. 3 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics Downloaded 3,028 times History Received 8 October 2019 Accepted 6 December 2019 Published online 24 January 2020 Published in print March 2020 Information© 2020 Xingcai XhangKeywordshigh throughputmicrochannel arraysmicrofluidicsmonodisperse dropletsspontaneous transformationstep emulsificationAuthor contributionsX Zhang and L Liu conceived and wrote the paper. N Xiang, Z Ni and X Huang provided the related references. J Zheng and Y Wang provided constructive discussions for the challenges and perspective section. X Zhang approved the final version of the manuscript.Financial & competing interests disclosureThe authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.Open accessThis work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/PDF download

Droplet Generation in Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Devices for the Creation of Artificial Cells

Understanding the microfluidic generation of double emulsion droplets with alginate shell

Synthesis of scalable microdroplets with fluid instability of shearing flow in microfluidics

A 3D printed size-tunable flow-focusing droplet microdevice to produce cell-laden hydrogel microspheres

Preparation of uniform microcapsules with silicone oil as continuous phase in a micro-dispersion process.

Microfluidic large-scale integration on a chip for mass production of monodisperse droplets and particles.

Easy Generation of Droplets in a Capillary Inserted Microchannel

Generation Of Size-Controlled Poly (Ethylene Glycol) Diacrylate Droplets Via Semi-3-Dimensional Flow Focusing Microfluidic Devices

Investigation of Microfluidic Co-Flow Effects on Step Emulsification: Interfacial Tension and Flow Velocities

Performance optimization of droplet formation and break up within a microfluidic device – Numerical and experimental evaluation

Droplet-based fabrication of alginate hydrogel microparticles in presence of surfactants

Optimizing the Production of Hydrogel Microspheres Using Microfluidic Chips: The Influence of Surface Treatment on Droplet Formation Mechanism

Alternating Force Based Drop-on-Demand Microdroplet Formation and Three-Dimensional Deposition

Droplets Transport in a Microfluidic Chip for In Vitro Compartmentalisation

Numerical and artificial neural network analysis of an axisymmetric co-flow-focusing microfluidic droplet generator using active and passive control

Scalable Production of Monodisperse Functional Microspheres by Multilayer Parallelization of High Aspect Ratio Microfluidic Channels

Enhanced Control and Efficiency in Millimeter-Scale Composite Droplets Preparation

Droplet Pattern Formation and Translation in New Microfluidic Flow-Focusing Devices

Flow synthesis of poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) microspheres in a microreactor: Experimental and CFD studies

A Monolithic 3D Printed Axisymmetric Co-Flow Single and Compound Emulsion Generator

Step Emulsification: High-Throughput Production of Monodisperse Droplets.