Influential Evaluations: Detailed Case Studies Operations Evaluation Department World Bank Operations Evaluation Department January 2005 Influential Evaluations: Detailed Case Studies Enhancing Development Effectiveness through Excellence and Independence in Evaluation Abbreviations and Acronyms Asd

E W O R L D B A N K O P E R A T I O N S E V A L U A T,Ananya Basu,Stephen Howes,Jikun Huang,Xu Jintao,Uma Lele,Radhika Nayak,Samuel Paul,Ulrich Schmitt,Susan Shen,Shi,Susan Stout,Tilmes Klaus,Manager
2005-01-01
Abstract:Evaluators are often asked the question by decision-makers: why should I take evaluation seriously, and devote time and effort to doing it well? This volume illustrates the potential benefits from evaluation by presenting eight case studies of evaluations which were highly cost-effective and of considerable utility to the intended users. A central message is that well-designed evaluations, conducted at the right time and developed in close consultation with intended users, can be a highly cost-effective way to improve the performance of development interventions. The Operations Evaluation Department (OED) is an independent unit within the World Bank; it reports directly to the Bank's Board of Executive Directors. OED assesses what works, and what does not; how a borrower plans to run and maintain a project; and the lasting contribution of the Bank to a country's overall development. The goals of evaluation are to learn from experience, to provide an objective basis for assessing the results of the Bank's work, and to provide accountability in the achievement of its objectives. It also improves Bank work by identifying and disseminating the lessons learned from experience and by framing recommendations drawn from evaluation findings. Evaluation Capacity Development (ECD) helps build sound governance in countries—improving transparency and building a performance culture within governments to support better management and policymaking, including the budget process—through support for the creation or strengthening of national/sectoral monitoring and evaluation systems. OED aims to identify and help develop good-practice approaches in countries, and to share the growing body of experience with such work. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. ii Acknowledgements This Influential Evaluations: Detailed Case Studies volume was prepared as a team effort, with substantive contributions from a number of individuals. Michael Bamberger was the principal researcher and advisor for the study, and he also prepared the case studies on the Bangalore report card and the Uganda public expenditure tracking surveys. Valuable support was provided by Elaine Wee-Ling Ooi (consultant), who also prepared a detailed case study on the China forest evaluation. Other authors of the individual case studies are listed below. A companion volume, Influential Evaluations, presents these case studies in summary form. These publications are also available from OED's evaluation capacity development website: OED would like to thank all of …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?