Comment on “ Major Factors Infl uencing the Effi cacy of Vegetated Buff ers on Sediment Trapping : A Review and Analysis

Xingmei Liu,Xuyang Zhang,Minghua Zhang

2016-01-01

Abstract:Dear Editor, Liu et al. (2008) provide a general overview of many of the physical factors aff ecting sediment removal by vegetated buff ers, including soil, buff er width, area ratio, fl ow, buff er slope, rainfall intensity, and vegetation. Th e authors also present data from over 80 scientifi c studies on buff er characteristics and their trapping effi cacy for sediment. While it is good to see the use of published data rather than focus on new, extensive fi eld studies, it is discouraging to see continued statistical analyses that attempt to relate physical characteristics of the buff er system (i.e., slope, vegetation, area ratio, and buff er width) to sediment and/or contaminant removal. For example, the authors rely specifi cally on regression models that attempt to predict sediment removal as functions of either buff er width or slope. Th eir regression equations have low to moderate statistical strength, as quantifi ed through coeffi cients of determination (R2 of less than 0.35). Th e authors also developed a regression equation between sediment removal and the two variables of slope and buff er width. Th e results from the regression analyses suggested that removal effi cacy is greatest for a 9% slope, but the authors off er no physical or theoretical explanation for this result. More likely is that the maximum effi ciency at this slope is a product of the data sources and the relatively fewer data points in their database for slopes between 6 and 10%. Th e authors correctly conclude that “...other factors might also be important for the effi cacies of vegetated buffers for sediment removal.” Attempts to predict reductions in sediment and contaminants relative to vegetative fi lter strip (VFS) physical characteristics alone (such as width, slope, area ratios, and/or vegetative types) are inadequate. Physical characteristics of the buff er system are not driving sediment and contaminant reductions. Rather it is the hydrologic impacts of these physical characteristics on the VFS system that drive sediment and contaminant removal. Consider for example that the presence of sheet versus concentrated fl ow will signifi cantly impact the resulting sediment and/or contaminant removal effi ciencies. Instead of attempting to develop equations relating physical characteristics of the buff er to the sediment reduction, two alternative approaches seem more reasonable. First, in the desire to develop empirical equations, variables of primary interest should be those that quantify the hydrologic response of the system. A new study by Sabbagh et al. (2009) in the Journal of Environmental Quality highlights Comment on “Major Factors Infl uencing the Effi cacy of Vegetated Buff ers on Sediment Trapping: A Review and Analysis,” by Xingmei Liu, Xuyang Zhang, and Minghua Zhang in the Journal of Environmental Quality 2008 37:1667–1674