Abstract:Dear Editor, Liu et al. (2008) provide a general overview of many of the physical factors aff ecting sediment removal by vegetated buff ers, including soil, buff er width, area ratio, fl ow, buff er slope, rainfall intensity, and vegetation. Th e authors also present data from over 80 scientifi c studies on buff er characteristics and their trapping effi cacy for sediment. While it is good to see the use of published data rather than focus on new, extensive fi eld studies, it is discouraging to see continued statistical analyses that attempt to relate physical characteristics of the buff er system (i.e., slope, vegetation, area ratio, and buff er width) to sediment and/or contaminant removal. For example, the authors rely specifi cally on regression models that attempt to predict sediment removal as functions of either buff er width or slope. Th eir regression equations have low to moderate statistical strength, as quantifi ed through coeffi cients of determination (R2 of less than 0.35). Th e authors also developed a regression equation between sediment removal and the two variables of slope and buff er width. Th e results from the regression analyses suggested that removal effi cacy is greatest for a 9% slope, but the authors off er no physical or theoretical explanation for this result. More likely is that the maximum effi ciency at this slope is a product of the data sources and the relatively fewer data points in their database for slopes between 6 and 10%. Th e authors correctly conclude that “...other factors might also be important for the effi cacies of vegetated buffers for sediment removal.” Attempts to predict reductions in sediment and contaminants relative to vegetative fi lter strip (VFS) physical characteristics alone (such as width, slope, area ratios, and/or vegetative types) are inadequate. Physical characteristics of the buff er system are not driving sediment and contaminant reductions. Rather it is the hydrologic impacts of these physical characteristics on the VFS system that drive sediment and contaminant removal. Consider for example that the presence of sheet versus concentrated fl ow will signifi cantly impact the resulting sediment and/or contaminant removal effi ciencies. Instead of attempting to develop equations relating physical characteristics of the buff er to the sediment reduction, two alternative approaches seem more reasonable. First, in the desire to develop empirical equations, variables of primary interest should be those that quantify the hydrologic response of the system. A new study by Sabbagh et al. (2009) in the Journal of Environmental Quality highlights Comment on “Major Factors Infl uencing the Effi cacy of Vegetated Buff ers on Sediment Trapping: A Review and Analysis,” by Xingmei Liu, Xuyang Zhang, and Minghua Zhang in the Journal of Environmental Quality 2008 37:1667–1674

Effects of vegetation buffer strips on concentrated flow hydraulics and gully bed erosion based on in situ scouring experiments

Influence of Vegetation Filter Strip on Slope Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Loss

Effects of Vegetation Stems on Hydraulics of Overland Flow under Varying Water Discharges

Numerical Simulation of Dam-Break Flow and Bed Change Considering the Vegetation Effects

Impacts of different vegetation in riparian buffer strips on runoff and sediment loss

Experimental investigation of the effects of shrub filter strips on debris flow trapping and interception

Spatiotemporal changes in flow hydraulic characteristics and soil loss during gully headcut erosion under controlled conditions

Effects of riparian buffer vegetation types and width on pollutant removal

A Review of Vegetated Buffers and a Meta-Analysis of Their Mitigation Efficacy in Reducing Nonpoint Source Pollution.

Synergistic effects of vegetation restoration and check dams on water erosion in a slope‐gully system

Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: a review and analysis.

Experimental study of the effects of riverbank vegetation conditions on riverbank erosion processes

Comment on “ Major Factors Infl uencing the Effi cacy of Vegetated Buff ers on Sediment Trapping : A Review and Analysis

Tracking Long-Term Effects of Check Dams and Afforestation on Debris Flow Mitigation in an Active Gully

The riverbank vegetation for mitigating the adverse effects of sediment dredging

Distinguishing the effects of vegetation restoration on runoff and sediment generation on simulated rainfall on the hillslopes of the loess plateau of China

Experimental Research on Erosion Characteristics of Ecological Slopes under the Scouring of Non-Directional Inflow

Study on Landscape Patches Influencing Hillslope Erosion Processes and Flow Hydrodynamics in the Loess Plateau of Western Shanxi Province, China

Vegetative Buffer Strips for Reducing Herbicide Transport in Runoff: Effects of Buffer Width, Vegetation, and Season

Effects of Different Patterns of Contour Grass Hedgerow on Soil Erosion Control

An experimental study of the hydrodynamics and contaminant transport in a Y‐shaped confluence with flexible submerged vegetation