Abstract:Dear Editor, Liu et al. (2008) provide a general overview of many of the physical factors aff ecting sediment removal by vegetated buff ers, including soil, buff er width, area ratio, fl ow, buff er slope, rainfall intensity, and vegetation. Th e authors also present data from over 80 scientifi c studies on buff er characteristics and their trapping effi cacy for sediment. While it is good to see the use of published data rather than focus on new, extensive fi eld studies, it is discouraging to see continued statistical analyses that attempt to relate physical characteristics of the buff er system (i.e., slope, vegetation, area ratio, and buff er width) to sediment and/or contaminant removal. For example, the authors rely specifi cally on regression models that attempt to predict sediment removal as functions of either buff er width or slope. Th eir regression equations have low to moderate statistical strength, as quantifi ed through coeffi cients of determination (R2 of less than 0.35). Th e authors also developed a regression equation between sediment removal and the two variables of slope and buff er width. Th e results from the regression analyses suggested that removal effi cacy is greatest for a 9% slope, but the authors off er no physical or theoretical explanation for this result. More likely is that the maximum effi ciency at this slope is a product of the data sources and the relatively fewer data points in their database for slopes between 6 and 10%. Th e authors correctly conclude that “...other factors might also be important for the effi cacies of vegetated buffers for sediment removal.” Attempts to predict reductions in sediment and contaminants relative to vegetative fi lter strip (VFS) physical characteristics alone (such as width, slope, area ratios, and/or vegetative types) are inadequate. Physical characteristics of the buff er system are not driving sediment and contaminant reductions. Rather it is the hydrologic impacts of these physical characteristics on the VFS system that drive sediment and contaminant removal. Consider for example that the presence of sheet versus concentrated fl ow will signifi cantly impact the resulting sediment and/or contaminant removal effi ciencies. Instead of attempting to develop equations relating physical characteristics of the buff er to the sediment reduction, two alternative approaches seem more reasonable. First, in the desire to develop empirical equations, variables of primary interest should be those that quantify the hydrologic response of the system. A new study by Sabbagh et al. (2009) in the Journal of Environmental Quality highlights Comment on “Major Factors Infl uencing the Effi cacy of Vegetated Buff ers on Sediment Trapping: A Review and Analysis,” by Xingmei Liu, Xuyang Zhang, and Minghua Zhang in the Journal of Environmental Quality 2008 37:1667–1674

Modeling study on the time-varying process of sediment trapping in vegetative filter strips

Simulation of Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport Using a Physically-Based Integrated Surface-Subsurface Model

Application and Design of an Efficient Siphon Dewatering System for Debris Flow Mitigation: A Case Study of a Small Catchment in Zhejiang Province, China

Retention Efficiencies of Vegetative Filter Strips in Reducing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution in Jianghan Plain: Experiments and VFSMOD Modeling

Modeling Soil Erosion Dynamic Processes along Hillslopes with Vegetation Impact Across Different Land Uses on the Loess Plateau of China

Time-varying sensitivity analysis of hydrologic and sediment parameters at multiple timescales: Implications for conservation practices

Dynamic prediction of effective runoff sediment particle size for improved assessment of erosion mitigation efficiency with vegetative filter strips

An integrated model of substrate clogging in vertical flow constructed wetlands

Uncertainty evaluation of coliform bacteria removal from vegetated filter strip under overland flow condition

Construction of a monthly dynamic sediment delivery ratio model at the hillslope scale: a case study from a hilly loess region

Analytical Solution of Suspended Sediment Concentration Profile: Relevance of Dispersive Flow Term in Vegetated Channels

Experimental Study on Slope Runoff, Erosion and Sediment under Different Vegetation Types

Quantifying Colloid Fate and Transport Through Dense Vegetation and Soil Systems Using a Particle-Plugging Tempered Fractional-Derivative Model

Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: a review and analysis.

Modeling the Process of Hillslope Soil Erosion in the Loess Plateau

Review and improvement of conventional models for reservoir sediment trapping efficiency

Optimization Models for the Design of Vegetative Filter Strips for Stormwater Runoff and Sediment Control

Comment on “ Major Factors Infl uencing the Effi cacy of Vegetated Buff ers on Sediment Trapping : A Review and Analysis

Coupling of SWAT and EPIC Models to Investigate the Mutual Feedback Relationship between Vegetation and Soil Erosion, a Case Study in the Huangfuchuan Watershed, China

Modeling of velocity and shear stress profiles in the ecological channel with floating vegetation

Modeling of Vegetation-Erosion Dynamics in Watershed Systems