Author response to reviewer’s comments

Fuqiang Tian,Guangheng Ni,Aizhong Hou,Hui Lu
2017-01-01
Abstract:1. The authors indicated that they have evaluated the performance of the products at various spatial and temporal scale. However, in the abstract Line 26 to 28, the spatial and temporal scale of the evaluation is not indicated. Response: We have added a description of spatial (point, sub-basin, basin) and temporal (daily, monthly and seasonal) scales to the manuscript in p1 of L28-30. 2. The abstract should be rewritten to summarize the evaluation result at the multiple temporal and spatial scale. The authors indicated that they have done evaluated the 8 products at various temporal (daily, monthly, seasonal) and spatial (point, sub-basin, basin) scales. However, they did not indicated clearly which products worked at what scale. Response: We have now modified the abstract to show details of the performance, at the different spatial and temporal scales in paragraph 2 and 3.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?