Abstract:Derivations under different grammar formalisms allow extraction of various dependency structures. Particularly, bilexical deep dependency structures beyond surface tree representation can be derived from linguistic analysis grounded by CCG, LFG, and HPSG. Traditionally, these dependency structures are obtained as a by-product of grammar-guided parsers. In this article, we study the alternative data-driven, transition-based approach, which has achieved great success for tree parsing, to build general dependency graphs. We integrate existing tree parsing techniques and present two new transition systems that can generate arbitrary directed graphs in an incremental manner. Statistical parsers that are competitive in both accuracy and efficiency can be built upon these transition systems. Furthermore, the heterogeneous design of transition systems yields diversity of the corresponding parsing models and thus greatly benefits parser ensemble. Concerning the disambiguation problem, we introduce two new techniques, namely, transition combination and tree approximation, to improve parsing quality. Transition combination makes every action performed by a parser significantly change configurations. Therefore, more distinct features can be extracted for statistical disambiguation. With the same goal of extracting informative features, tree approximation induces tree backbones from dependency graphs and re-uses tree parsing techniques to produce tree-related features. We conduct experiments on CCG-grounded functor–argument analysis, LFG-grounded grammatical relation analysis, and HPSG-grounded semantic dependency analysis for English and Chinese. Experiments demonstrate that data-driven models with appropriate transition systems can produce high-quality deep dependency analysis, comparable to more complex grammar-driven models. Experiments also indicate the effectiveness of the heterogeneous design of transition systems for parser ensemble, transition combination, as well as tree approximation for statistical disambiguation.

Peking at EPE 2017: A comparison of tree approximation, transition-based, and maximum subgraph models for semantic dependency analysis

Peking: Profiling Syntactic Tree Parsing Techniques for Semantic Graph Parsing

Peking: Building Semantic Dependency Graphs with a Hybrid Parser.

Data-driven, PCFG-based and Pseudo-PCFG-based Models for Chinese Dependency Parsing

A Neural Transition-Based Approach for Semantic Dependency Graph Parsing

Transition-Based Chinese Semantic Dependency Graph Parsing.

Peking at MRP 2019: Factorization- and Composition-Based Parsing for Elementary Dependency Structures

Transition-Based Parsing for Deep Dependency Structures.

A Comparison of Chinese Parsers for Stanford Dependencies.

Dependency Graph Based Chinese Semantic Parsing

Combining Data-Driven Constituent and Dependency Parsers for CIPS-ParsEval-2009

Chinese Dependency Parsing Based on Treebank

An Empirical Comparison of Probability Models for Dependency Grammar

Dependency Parsing with Partial Annotations: an Empirical Comparison.

Parsing the penn chinese treebank with semantic knowledge

Neural Maximum Subgraph Parsing for Cross-Domain Semantic Dependency Analysis.

Probabilistic Model for Syntactic and Semantic Dependency Parsing

A Joint Syntactic and Semantic Dependency Parsing System based on Maximum Entropy Models.

The Construction and Measure Method of Dependency Parsing Tree Model

A Tree-to-String EBMT Method by Integrating Joint Model of Chinese Segmentation and Dependency Parsing

Chinese Dependency Parsing Based on an Improved Model of MST