Abstract:Derivations under different grammar formalisms allow extraction of various dependency structures. Particularly, bilexical deep dependency structures beyond surface tree representation can be derived from linguistic analysis grounded by CCG, LFG, and HPSG. Traditionally, these dependency structures are obtained as a by-product of grammar-guided parsers. In this article, we study the alternative data-driven, transition-based approach, which has achieved great success for tree parsing, to build general dependency graphs. We integrate existing tree parsing techniques and present two new transition systems that can generate arbitrary directed graphs in an incremental manner. Statistical parsers that are competitive in both accuracy and efficiency can be built upon these transition systems. Furthermore, the heterogeneous design of transition systems yields diversity of the corresponding parsing models and thus greatly benefits parser ensemble. Concerning the disambiguation problem, we introduce two new techniques, namely, transition combination and tree approximation, to improve parsing quality. Transition combination makes every action performed by a parser significantly change configurations. Therefore, more distinct features can be extracted for statistical disambiguation. With the same goal of extracting informative features, tree approximation induces tree backbones from dependency graphs and re-uses tree parsing techniques to produce tree-related features. We conduct experiments on CCG-grounded functor–argument analysis, LFG-grounded grammatical relation analysis, and HPSG-grounded semantic dependency analysis for English and Chinese. Experiments demonstrate that data-driven models with appropriate transition systems can produce high-quality deep dependency analysis, comparable to more complex grammar-driven models. Experiments also indicate the effectiveness of the heterogeneous design of transition systems for parser ensemble, transition combination, as well as tree approximation for statistical disambiguation.

Peking: Profiling Syntactic Tree Parsing Techniques for Semantic Graph Parsing

Peking: Building Semantic Dependency Graphs with a Hybrid Parser.

Peking at EPE 2017: A comparison of tree approximation, transition-based, and maximum subgraph models for semantic dependency analysis

A Neural Transition-Based Approach for Semantic Dependency Graph Parsing

Transition-Based Chinese Semantic Dependency Graph Parsing.

NJU-Parser: Achievements on Semantic Dependency Parsing.

SemEval-2016 Task 9: Chinese Semantic Dependency Parsing.

Peking at MRP 2019: Factorization- and Composition-Based Parsing for Elementary Dependency Structures

Dependency Graph Based Chinese Semantic Parsing

Data-driven, PCFG-based and Pseudo-PCFG-based Models for Chinese Dependency Parsing

Combining Data-Driven Constituent and Dependency Parsers for CIPS-ParsEval-2009

Improve Chinese Semantic Dependency Parsing Via Syntactic Dependency Parsing

SemEval-2012 Task 5: Chinese Semantic Dependency Parsing

Comparative Analytical Study of Cutting-Edge Dependency Parsing for Nature Language Processing

Exploiting Multiple Treebanks for Parsing with Quasi-Synchronous Grammars

Transition-Based Parsing for Deep Dependency Structures.

Application of data oriented parsing method in Chinese syntactic analysis

Probabilistic Model for Syntactic and Semantic Dependency Parsing

A Cascaded Syntactic and Semantic Dependency Parsing System.

Parsing Penn Chinese Treebank Based on Lexicalized Model

Multilingual Dependency-based Syntactic and Semantic Parsing.