Abstract:BACKGROUND:Sample size planning for longitudinal data is crucial when designing mediation studies because sufficient statistical power is not only required in grant applications and peer-reviewed publications, but is essential to reliable research results. However, sample size determination is not straightforward for mediation analysis of longitudinal design.METHODS:To facilitate planning the sample size for longitudinal mediation studies with a multilevel mediation model, this article provides the sample size required to achieve 80% power by simulations under various sizes of the mediation effect, within-subject correlations and numbers of repeated measures. The sample size calculation is based on three commonly used mediation tests: Sobel's method, distribution of product method and the bootstrap method.RESULTS:Among the three methods of testing the mediation effects, Sobel's method required the largest sample size to achieve 80% power. Bootstrapping and the distribution of the product method performed similarly and were more powerful than Sobel's method, as reflected by the relatively smaller sample sizes. For all three methods, the sample size required to achieve 80% power depended on the value of the ICC (i.e., within-subject correlation). A larger value of ICC typically required a larger sample size to achieve 80% power. Simulation results also illustrated the advantage of the longitudinal study design. The sample size tables for most encountered scenarios in practice have also been published for convenient use.CONCLUSIONS:Extensive simulations study showed that the distribution of the product method and bootstrapping method have superior performance to the Sobel's method, but the product method was recommended to use in practice in terms of less computation time load compared to the bootstrapping method. A R package has been developed for the product method of sample size determination in mediation longitudinal study design.

Impact of Violations of Measurement Invariance in Cross-Lagged Panel Mediation Models

Bias, Type I Error Rates, and Statistical Power of a Latent Mediation Model in the Presence of Violations of Invariance

The Quadratic Inference Functions in Measurement Error Model for Longitudinal Data

Estimation and inference for the mediation effect in a time-varying mediation model

Autoregressive mediation models using composite scores and latent variables: Comparisons and recommendations.

Testing Measurement Invariance Across Unobserved Groups: The Role of Covariates in Factor Mixture Modeling

A Monte Carlo Study of the Effects of Common Method Variance on Significance Testing and Parameter Bias in Hierarchical Linear Modeling

Latent Class Dynamic Mediation Model with Application to Smoking Cessation Data

Sample Size Determination for Mediation Analysis of Longitudinal Data.

Longitudinal mediation analysis through generalised linear mixed models: a comparison of maximum-likelihood and Bayesian estimation

Identifiability and Estimation of Causal Mediation Effects with Missing Data

Using Instrumental Variables to Measure Causation over Time in Cross-Lagged Panel Models

The Combined Effects of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders in the Single-Mediator Model

On the impact of parametric assumptions and robust alternatives for longitudinal data analysis.

Reprint: Statistical inference for linear mediation models with high-dimensional mediators and application to studying stock reaction to COVID-19 pandemic

Estimating and Testing Mediation Effects with Censored Data

Handling multivariable missing data in causal mediation analysis

A Class of Distribution-Free Models for Longitudinal Mediation Analysis

Improving measurement-invariance assessments: correcting entrenched testing deficiencies

Effects of Latent Variable Nonnormality and Model Misspecification on Testing Structural Equation Modeling Interactions

A Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimating Cross-Lagged Effects from a Causal Inference Perspective