Abstract:Background: Multiple imputation (MI) was developed as a method to enable valid inferences to be obtained in the presence of missing data rather than to re-create the missing values. Within the applied setting, it remains unclear how important it is that imputed values should be plausible for individual observations. One variable type for which MI may lead to implausible values is a limited-range variable, where imputed values may fall outside the observable range. The aim of this work was to compare methods for imputing limited-range variables, with a focus on those that restrict the range of the imputed values. Methods: Using data from a study of adolescent health, we consider three variables based on responses to the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), a tool for detecting minor psychiatric illness. These variables, based on different scoring methods for the GHQ, resulted in three continuous distributions with mild, moderate and severe positive skewness. In an otherwise complete dataset, we set 33% of the GHQ observations to missing completely at random or missing at random; repeating this process to create 1000 datasets with incomplete data for each scenario.For each dataset, we imputed values on the raw scale and following a zero-skewness log transformation using: univariate regression with no rounding; post-imputation rounding; truncated normal regression; and predictive mean matching. We estimated the marginal mean of the GHQ and the association between the GHQ and a fully observed binary outcome, comparing the results with complete data statistics. Results: Imputation with no rounding performed well when applied to data on the raw scale. Post-imputation rounding and imputation using truncated normal regression produced higher marginal means than the complete data estimate when data had a moderate or severe skew, and this was associated with under-coverage of the complete data estimate. Predictive mean matching also produced under-coverage of the complete data estimate. For the estimate of association, all methods produced similar estimates to the complete data. Conclusions: For data with a limited range, multiple imputation using techniques that restrict the range of imputed values can result in biased estimates for the marginal mean when data are highly skewed.

A Comparison of FIML- versus Multiple-imputation-based methods to test measurement invariance with incomplete ordinal variables

Testing Measurement Invariance Across Unobserved Groups: The Role of Covariates in Factor Mixture Modeling

A Comparative Study of Imputation Methods for Multivariate Ordinal Data

Multiple Imputation of Missing Categorical and Continuous Values via Bayesian Mixture Models with Local Dependence

Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance

Multiple Imputation with Factor Scores: A Practical Approach for Handling Simultaneous Missingness Across Items in Longitudinal Designs

Testing Measurement Invariance of Satisfaction with Life Scale(SWLS)based on the Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis

A comparison of multiple imputation strategies for handling missing data in multi‐item scales: Guidance for longitudinal studies

Comparison of methods for imputing limited-range variables: a simulation study

Testing measurement invariance across groups: applications in cross-cultural research.

Multiple Imputation Methods for Missing Multilevel Ordinal Outcomes

Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

Studying Factorial Invariance With Nominal Items: A Note on a Latent Variable Modeling Procedure

Bayesian penalty methods for evaluating measurement invariance in moderated nonlinear factor analysis.

Dealing with missing data in multi-informant studies: A comparison of approaches

Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning in Latent Class Analysis With Stepwise Multiple Indicator Multiple Cause Modeling

A Comparison of Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Network Models for Measurement Invariance Assessment When Indicator Residuals are Correlated

The dire disregard of measurement invariance testing in psychological science.

A checklist for testing measurement invariance

Improving measurement-invariance assessments: correcting entrenched testing deficiencies

Multiple imputation for missing data: fully conditional specification versus multivariate normal imputation