Abstract:Introduction: the spleen is one of the most commonly injured organ following blunt abdominal trauma. Splenic injuries may occur in isolation or in association with other intra-and extra-abdominal injury. Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen has become routine in children. In adult most minor splenic injuries are readily treated nonoperatively but controversy exists regarding the role of nonoperative management for higher grade injuries above all in multi-trauma patients. The aim of this study is the assessment of splenic trauma treatment, with particular attention to conservative treatment, its limits, its efficiency, and its safety in multi-trauma patient or in a severe trauma patient. Methods: the present research focused on a retrospective review of patients with splenic injury. The research was performed by analyzing data of the trauma registry of St. Andrea University Hospital in Rome. The St. Andrea University Hospital trauma registry includes 1859. The variables taken into account were spleen injury and general injuries, age, sex, cause and dynamic of trauma, hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cells count, INR, number and time blood transfusion, hemodynamic stability, type of treatment provided, hospitalization period, morbidity and mortality. Assessment of splenic injuries was evaluated according to Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Results: the analysis among the general population of spleen trauma patients identified 68 patients with a splenic injury representing the 41.2% of all abdomen injury. The Average age was of 37.01 ± 17.18 years. The Average ISS value was of 22.88 ± 12.85; mediana of 24.50 (range 4-66). The average Spleen AIS value was of 3.13 ± 0.88; mediana 3.00 (range 2-5). The overall mortality ratio was of 19.1% (13 patients). The average ISS value in patients who died was of 41.92 ± 12.48, whereas in patients who survided was of 23.33 ± 10.15. The difference was considered to be statistically significant (p <0.001). The relashionship between the ISS and AIS values in patients who died was considered directly proportional but not statistically significant (Pearson test AIS/ISS = 0.132, p = n.s.). The initial management was a conservative treatment in 27 patients (39.7%) of them 4 patients (15%) failed, in the other 41 cases urgent splenectomies were performed. The average spleen AIS in all the patients who underwent splenectomy was 3.61 ± 0.63 whereas in the patients who were not treated surgically was 2.42 ± 0.69. The difference was deemed statistically significant (p <0.001). Conclusion: splenic injury, as reported in our statistic as well as in literature, is the most common injury in closed abdominal trauma. Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen in adults has been applied with increasing frequency. However, the criteria for nonoperative management are controversial. The preference of a conservative treatment must be based on the hemodynamic stability indices as well as on the spleen lesion severity and on the general trauma severity. The conservative treatment represent a feasible and safe therapeutic alternative even in case of severe lesions in politrauma patients, but the choice of the treatment form requires an assessment for each singular case.

Efficacy evaluation of different conservative treatments for blunt spleen rupture

The Comparison Between Surgical Procedure and Conservative Treatment in the Management of Traumatic Subdural Effusion

Analysis of High Risk Factors of Traumatic Splenic Rupture

Analysis of the treatment for 130 cases of traumatic spleen rupture

Clinical analysis of non-operative treatment in 45 cases with traumatic spleen rupture

Logistic Analysis of Impact Factors of Treatment Decision: a Study on 147 Patients with Traumatic Ruptured Spleen

Comparison of Curative Effect Between Two Operation Methods on Treatment of the Simple Third-Fourth Grade of Traumatic Spleen Rupture in Patients with Shock

Nonoperative Treatment for Splenic Rupture in 55 Cases

The Preserving Therapy of Traumatogenic Spleen Rupture in 46 Cases

New Opinion on Radiological Grade and Conservative Treatment of Children Splenic Injury

Contemporary Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma in Adults: An Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Registry

Preserving spleen treatments to traumatic rupture of the spleen

Blunt splenic injury in adults: clinical and CT criteria for management, with emphasis on active extravasation

Non-operative management of blunt splenic injury: is it really so extensively feasible? a critical appraisal of a single-center experience

Blunt splenic injuries: nonsurgical treatment with CT, arteriography, and transcatheter arterial embolization of the splenic artery.

Non-operative treatment approach for blunt splenic injury: is grade the unique criterion?

Clinical Outcomes of Splenic Artery Embolization Versus Splenectomy in the Management of Hemodynamically Stable High-Grade Blunt Splenic Injuries: A National Analysis

Differences in Management and Outcomes in Atraumatic Splenic Rupture Compared to Traumatic Injury Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Autologous Transfusion of Drained Blood from Abdomen for Conservative Treatment of Blunt Trauma of Spleen

Effect evaluation of traumatic rupture of spleen treated by retention or resection surgery

Management of Adult Blunt Splenic Injury in 88 Cases