Abstract:Background/Objectives: To evaluate the differences in treatment and outcomes between traumatic and atraumatic splenic lacerations. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients with a diagnosis of splenic lacerations confirmed by computed tomography that presented from 01/2010 to 03/2023 at one tertiary hospital. The exclusion criteria included missing image data and death in the first 24 h due to extensive trauma. The etiology of the splenic laceration, demographic characteristics, and clinical parameters were recorded and evaluated as prognostic factors in therapy success and mortality. Subgroup analyses were undertaken according to the etiology of the splenic laceration and the primary treatment. The extent of splenic laceration was assessed by using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) score in its latest revision (2018). Results: Of all 291 enrolled patients (mean age 47 ± 21 years, 204 males), 50 presented with atraumatic splenic lacerations due to different underlying causes. The occurrence of moderate and high-grade laceration differed significantly between the atraumatic and traumatic study group (45/50 [90%] vs. 139/241 [58%], p < 0.001). Accordingly, the number of patients being treated conservatively differed greatly (20/50 [40%] vs. 164/241 [56%]), with a worse clinical success rate for atraumatic lacerations (75% vs. 94.5%). Atraumatic splenic injuries showed a higher conversion rate to surgery (2/20 [10%] vs. 2/164 [1%]). Despite the lower clinical success rate of splenic artery embolization (SAE) in atraumatic injuries (87% vs. 97%), the number of patients needing treatment for primary SAE in AAST 3 injuries was 14.1 in the traumatic population and only 4 in the atraumatic population. Conclusions: Atraumatic splenic injuries should not be treated as traumatic splenic injuries. An early upgrade to SAE or surgery should be considered for moderate splenic injuries, and they should be evaluated by an interdisciplinary team on a case-by-case basis. However, due to the underlying multimorbidity of patients with atraumatic splenic injuries, a higher mortality is to be expected.

Management of Adult Blunt Splenic Injury in 88 Cases

Selective nonoperative management of traumatic splenic rupture in adults

Contemporary Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma in Adults: An Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Registry

Blunt splenic injuries: nonsurgical treatment with CT, arteriography, and transcatheter arterial embolization of the splenic artery.

Blunt splenic injury in adults: clinical and CT criteria for management, with emphasis on active extravasation

Non-operative treatment approach for blunt splenic injury: is grade the unique criterion?

Management of Splenic Injury at B&C Medical College, Teaching Hospital and Research Centre

Efficacy evaluation of different conservative treatments for blunt spleen rupture

Non-operative treatment of splenic trauma in children

Non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma: The role of splenic artery embolization depending on the severity of parenchymal injury

Non-operative management of splenic trauma

Experience of nonoperative management for 39 cases of closed spleen rupture

Diagnosis and Management of Colonic Injuries Following Blunt Trauma

Use of Splenic Artery Embolization as an Adjunct to Nonsurgical Management of Blunt Splenic Injury

Management and outcomes of splenic injuries secondary to blunt trauma in patients presenting to major trauma hospitals in Aotearoa New Zealand

Differences in Management and Outcomes in Atraumatic Splenic Rupture Compared to Traumatic Injury Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Analysis of the treatment for 130 cases of traumatic spleen rupture

Management of Major Blunt Renal Injury: A Twelve-Year Review at an Urban, Level I Trauma Hospital

New Opinion on Radiological Grade and Conservative Treatment of Children Splenic Injury

Contemporary National Trend in Surgical Management of Hemodynamically Unstable Pediatric Blunt Splenic Injury

The Effects of Splenic Artery Embolization on Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Injury: A 16-Year Experience