Abstract:Background: Severe and rigid scoliosis represents a type of spinal deformity characterized by a Cobb angle exceeding 90° and a flexibility of less than 30%. Halo spinal traction remains the established standard for managing severe scoliosis, although alternative approaches such as temporary internal distraction rods and staged surgical correction exist. The primary objective of this investigation was to compare two cohorts of patients treated using these distinct methods to ascertain any divergences in terms of surgical and radiological outcomes, pulmonary function (PF), and quality of life (QoL). Methods: This study encompassed a total of 62 pediatric patients meeting the specified criteria, which included severe idiopathic scoliosis (major Cobb curve >90) and flexibility <30%. Group 1 (G1) underwent surgical intervention involving preoperative Halo gravity traction (HGT) succeeded by posterior spinal fusion (PSF). On the other hand, Group 2 (G2) underwent a two-stage procedure starting with a less invasive temporary internal distraction technique (LITID) prior to PSF. The radiological outcomes, PF, and QoL were documented and assessed over a monitoring period ranging from 2 to 5 years. Results: The average preoperative major curves (MCs) measured 124° and 122° in G1 and G2, respectively (p < 0.426). Initial flexibility, as observed in preoperative bending films, ranged from 18% in G1 to 21% in G2 (p < 0.001). Following the ultimate surgical intervention, the MCs were corrected to 45° and 37.4° in G1 and G2, respectively (p < 0.001). The percentage correction of the MCs was higher in G2 (63% vs. 70% in G1 and G2, respectively), with significant between-group disparities (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative thoracic kyphoses (TKs) were 96.5° in G1 and 92° in G2 (p = 0.782), which were rectified to 45.8° in G1 and 36.2° in G2 (p < 0.001), equating to correction rates of 55% and 60% in the respective groups. Initially, G2 exhibited lower values for the percentage of predicted lung volume (FVC) and predicted FEV1 compared with G1 (49% and 58% vs. 54.5% and 60.8%; N.S.). Nonetheless, both groups demonstrated enhancements in their FVC and FEV1 values over the follow-up period. Conclusions: The surgical management of severe and untreated spinal curvatures in the pediatric and adolescent population can be considered safe, with a tolerable incidence of minor complications. LITID emerges as a method offering improved QoL and pulmonary function, achieving notably substantial average corrections in deformity by 70% in the coronal plane and 60% in the sagittal plane, alongside a mean increase in trunk height of 10.8 cm. Furthermore, a typical reduction of 76% in rib humps and enhancements in respiratory function, as indicated by improvements in 1 s predicted forced expiratory volume (by 25–56%) and forced vital capacity (by 35–65%), were achieved, leading to a clinically and statistically significant enhancement in QoL when evaluated using SRS-22r, without resorting to more radical, high-risk procedures.

Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Scoliosis with Intraspinal Anomalies

Two-staged Correction of Severe Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Intraspinal Abnormalities.

Preoperative Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe pediatric scoliosis and kyphosis

Efficacy of Halo-Gravity Traction in the Perioperative Treatment of Severe Scoliosis and Kyphosis: A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Patients

Pre-operative Halo-Gravity Traction in Severe Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Congenital Scoliosis with Thoracic Rotatory Subluxation

[Efficacy of Preoperative Halo-femoral Traction in the Treatment of Rigid Idiopathic Scoliosis].

Clinical efficacy of preoperative Halo gravity traction in the treatment of severe adolescent scoliosis

A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction and Postoperative Halo-Femoral Traction after Posterior Spinal Release in Corrective Surgery for Severe Kyphoscoliosis.

Halo-gravity Traction Combined with Growing Rod Treatment: an Effective Preoperative Management for Severe Early-Onset Scoliosis.

Severe kyphoscoliosis patients with type III spinal cord on preoperative apex MRI: preoperative traction does improve the safety of correction surgery

[Clinical Efficacy of Short-Term Halo-Pelvic Traction Combined with Surgery in the Treatment of Severe Spinal Deformities].

Preoperative halo-gravity traction combined with one-stage posterior spinal fusion surgery following for severe rigid scoliosis with pulmonary dysfunction: a cohort study

Radiological and Pulmonary Results of Surgical Treatment of Severe Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Preoperative Halo Gravity Traction Compared with Less Invasive Temporary Internal Distraction in Staged Surgery in Adolescents

Does Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction Reduce the Degree of Deformity and Improve Pulmonary Function in Severe Scoliosis Patients with Pulmonary Insufficiency? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of Halo-Femoral Traction after Posterior Spinal Release in Severe and Rigid Scoliosis

Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction for Patients with Severe Focal Kyphosis in the Upper Thoracic Spine A Safe and Effective Alternative for Three-Column Osteotomy

Posterior-only Surgery with Strong Halo-Femoral Traction for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliotic Curves More Than 100°.

Pre-operative Halo-Pelvic Traction for Neurofibromatosis Patients with Severe Proximal Thoracic Spinal Deformity: Indications and Early Treatment Outcome

Halo-gravity Traction in the Treatment of Severe Spinal Deformity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effects of Halo-gravity traction in patients with neurologic deficits secondary to severe focal angular kyphosis of the upper thoracic spine

The use of pre-operative halo traction to minimize risk for correction of severe scoliosis in a patient with Fontan circulation: a case report and review of literature