Abstract:Objective:To analyze the efficacy of posterior staged correction in the treatment of severe kyphoscoliosis.Methods:Retrospective analysis was conducted on 61 patients with severe kyphoscoliosis who underwent one-stage posterior Ponte osteotomy followed by Halo-femoral traction and two-stage posterior correction in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School between January 2010 and January 2020. There were 23 males and 38 females with an average age of 22.0(18.0, 25.5) years. The etiologies were idiopathic in 26 cases, congenital in 17 cases, neuromuscular in 16 cases and Marfan syndrome with kyphoscoliosis in 2 cases. The curves were thoracic in 49 cases, thoracolumbar in 3 cases and double major in 9 cases. The apical vertebrae were T 5 level in 1 case, T 7 level in 2 cases, T 8 level in 9 cases, T 9 level in 15 cases, T 10 level in 23 cases, T 11 level in 8 cases, T 12 level in 1 case, and L 1 level in 2 cases. The flexibility of main curve was 13.5%±8.6%. The Cobb angle of main curve, global kyphosis (GK), coronal trunk shift (CTS), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were assessed at pre-operation, post-traction, post-operation and the last follow-up. The quality of life was evaluated using the MOS item short form health survey (SF)-36 questionnaire, and the complications during peri-operation and long-term follow-up were recorded. Results:All 61 patients were followed up for 25.0 (24.0, 26.5) months. The Cobb angle of main curve and GK were 121.4°±13.9° and 86.8°±20.0° at pre-operation, 94.1°±18.7° and 66.9°±15.3° at post-traction, 78.5°±20.3° and 54.7°±13.6° at post-operation and 79.5°±20.1° and 53.2°±11.3° at the last follow-up, respectively. The differences were statistically significant ( F=210.54, P<0.001; F=93.74, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the last follow-up and post-operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant correction loss of SVA, TK, LL, PI, PT or SS at the last follow-up when compared with those at post-operation ( P>0.05). The CTS was 17.1±9.8 mm at pre-operation, 17.5±11.4 mm at post-operation, 11.1 (5.9, 23.3) mm at the last follow-up and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=6.70, P=0.035). The difference between the last follow-up and post-operation was statistically significant ( P=0.032). The scores of physical functioning 80.0 (75.0, 85.0), general health 82.0 (69.5, 87.0) and social functioning 75.0 (62.5, 75.0) in SF-36 at the last follow-up were significantly improved compared with those at pre-operation ( Z=-2.11, P=0.035; Z=-3.64, P<0.001; Z=-2.07, P=0.039). During the traction process, the complications included pin track infection in 1 case, deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity in 2, misplacement of pedicle screws in 3, coronal decompensation at immediate post-operation in 2, sagittal decompensation at immediate post-operation in 1, and 1 patient had broken rod at 3 years follow-up, respectively. Conclusion:The posterior staged correction could provide satisfying radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with severe kyphoscoliosis, which could be well maintained during 2 years follow-up. Therefore, the posterior staged correction is a safe and effective treatment for severe kyphoscoliosis.

A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction and Postoperative Halo-Femoral Traction after Posterior Spinal Release in Corrective Surgery for Severe Kyphoscoliosis.

Preoperative Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe pediatric scoliosis and kyphosis

Effectiveness of Halo-Femoral Traction after Posterior Spinal Release in Severe and Rigid Scoliosis

[Efficacy of Preoperative Halo-femoral Traction in the Treatment of Rigid Idiopathic Scoliosis].

Efficacy of Halo-Gravity Traction in the Perioperative Treatment of Severe Scoliosis and Kyphosis: A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Patients

The radiographic, pulmonary, and clinical outcomes of patients with severe rigid spinal deformities treated via halo‐pelvic traction

Effects of Halo-gravity traction in patients with neurologic deficits secondary to severe focal angular kyphosis of the upper thoracic spine

Two-staged Correction of Severe Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Intraspinal Abnormalities.

A comparison of posterior spinal osteotomy versus Halo traction with wide posterior release for severe spinal deformity

Comparison of the Clinical Outcome for Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated by Posterior Spinal Instrumentation with or Without Halo-femoral Traction after Anterior Release

Severe kyphoscoliosis patients with type III spinal cord on preoperative apex MRI: preoperative traction does improve the safety of correction surgery

Posterior surgery assisted by halo ring traction for the treatment of severe rigid nonangular cervical kyphosis.

Comparison of Effectiveness of Halo-femoral Traction after Anterior Spinal Release in Severe Idiopathic and Congenital Scoliosis: a Retrospective Study

Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction for Patients with Severe Focal Kyphosis in the Upper Thoracic Spine

Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Scoliosis with Intraspinal Anomalies

Clinical efficacy of preoperative Halo gravity traction in the treatment of severe adolescent scoliosis

Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction for Patients with Severe Focal Kyphosis in the Upper Thoracic Spine A Safe and Effective Alternative for Three-Column Osteotomy

Preoperative halo-gravity traction combined with one-stage posterior spinal fusion surgery following for severe rigid scoliosis with pulmonary dysfunction: a cohort study

Improvement of Pulmonary Function and Reconstructed 3-Dimensional Lung Volume after Halo-Pelvic Traction Combined with Posterior Correction for Severe Rigid Spinal Scoliosis: A Multicenter Study.

Efficacy of posterior staged correction in the treatment of severe kyphoscoliosis

[Efficiency of Preoperative Halo-gravity Traction in Severe Kyphoscoliosis Secondary to Neurofibromatosis Type Ⅰ].