Abstract:OBJECT:The surgical treatment of severe and rigid spinal deformities poses difficulties and dangers. In this article, the authors summarize their surgical techniques and evaluate patient outcomes after performing posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) for the correction of spinal deformities with curves greater than 100°, and investigate the crucial points to ensure neurological safety during this challenging procedure. METHODS:The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience with 28 patients with extremely severe (Cobb angles in the coronal or sagittal plane > 100°) and rigid thoracic or thoracolumbar spine deformities who underwent PVCR. The average patient age was 20.2 years and all patients underwent a minimum follow-up of 24 months (range 24-60 months). Patients were divided into groups according to their morphological classification as follows: kyphosis alone (Group A, 6 patients with a mean Cobb angle of 109.0° [range 105°-120°]); kyphoscoliosis with coronal plane curves notably greater than sagittal plane curves (Group B, 14 patients with mean scoliotic curves of 116.6° [range 102°-170°] and kyphotic curves of 77.7° [range 42°-160°]); and kyphoscoliosis with sagittal curves notably greater than coronal plane curves (Group C, 8 patients with a mean coronal curve of 85.4° [range 65°-110°] and a mean sagittal curve of 117.6° [range 102°-155°]). RESULTS:A total of 36 vertebrae were removed in 28 patients who had a severe rigid spinal deformity, and the mean fusion extent was 13.3 vertebrae (range 7-17 vertebrae). The mean operating time was 620 minutes (range 320-920 minutes) with an average operative blood loss of 6,680 ml (range 3,000-24,000 ml). The overall final correction rate of scoliosis was 59.0%, and average postoperative kyphotic Cobb angles ranged from 30.4° to 95.9°. In Group A the mean preoperative sagittal angle of 109.0° was corrected to a mean postoperative angle of 32.0°. In the Group B kyphoscoliotic patients, the correction rate in the coronal plane was 58.6%; the Cobb angle in the sagittal plane was corrected from a mean of 77.7° preoperatively to 25.1° postoperatively; in Group C, the correction rate in the coronal plane was 58.5%, and the mean sagittal angle was reduced from a mean of 117.6° preoperatively to 39.0°. Of the 28 patients who underwent PVCR, 46 complications were observed in 18 patients intra- and postoperatively. There were 5 neurological complications including 1 case of late-onset paralysis and 4 cases of thoracic nerve root pain, all of which resolved during the early follow-up period. Nonneurological complications occurred more often in kyphoscoliotic patients (41 complications). The mean follow-up of all patients was 33.7 months (range 24-60 months). CONCLUSIONS:Posterior vertebral column resection was effective in correcting severe rigid spinal deformity, although the procedure was technically demanding, exhaustingly lengthy, and was associated with a variety of complications. The PVCR technique created a space for spinal correction and spinal cord tension adjustment and the correction could be performed under direct inspection and by palpation of the tension in the spinal cord through the space. Therefore, in terms of the spinal cord, the deformity correction process involved in the PVCR procedure is relatively safe.

Two-staged Correction of Severe Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Intraspinal Abnormalities.

Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Scoliosis with Intraspinal Anomalies

Halo-gravity Traction in the Treatment of Severe Spinal Deformity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Preoperative Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe pediatric scoliosis and kyphosis

A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction and Postoperative Halo-Femoral Traction after Posterior Spinal Release in Corrective Surgery for Severe Kyphoscoliosis.

Efficacy of Halo-Gravity Traction in the Perioperative Treatment of Severe Scoliosis and Kyphosis: A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Patients

Effectiveness of Halo-Femoral Traction after Posterior Spinal Release in Severe and Rigid Scoliosis

[Clinical Efficacy of Short-Term Halo-Pelvic Traction Combined with Surgery in the Treatment of Severe Spinal Deformities].

[Efficacy of Preoperative Halo-femoral Traction in the Treatment of Rigid Idiopathic Scoliosis].

Presurgical Short-Term Halo-Pelvic Traction for Severe Rigid Scoliosis (cobb Angle >120°): A 2-Year Follow-up Review of 62 Patients.

Effects of Halo-gravity traction in patients with neurologic deficits secondary to severe focal angular kyphosis of the upper thoracic spine

Severe kyphoscoliosis patients with type III spinal cord on preoperative apex MRI: preoperative traction does improve the safety of correction surgery

Posterior vertebral column resection for correction of rigid spinal deformity curves greater than 100°.

Posterior surgery assisted by halo ring traction for the treatment of severe rigid nonangular cervical kyphosis.

Improvement of Pulmonary Function and Reconstructed 3-Dimensional Lung Volume after Halo-Pelvic Traction Combined with Posterior Correction for Severe Rigid Spinal Scoliosis: A Multicenter Study.

The radiographic, pulmonary, and clinical outcomes of patients with severe rigid spinal deformities treated via halo‐pelvic traction

Pulmonary Recovery Following Corrective Surgery in Adult Patients With Severe Scoliosis: A Minimum of Five-Year Follow-Up

Radiological and Pulmonary Results of Surgical Treatment of Severe Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Preoperative Halo Gravity Traction Compared with Less Invasive Temporary Internal Distraction in Staged Surgery in Adolescents

Posterior-only Surgery with Strong Halo-Femoral Traction for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliotic Curves More Than 100°.

Clinical efficacy of preoperative Halo gravity traction in the treatment of severe adolescent scoliosis

The Contribution of Preoperative Balanced Halo-Pelvic Traction to Severe Rigid Spinal Deformity Correction