Abstract:Purpose Using data obtained from 525 individuals who were surveyed during early spring 2020, this study addressed three aims: (1) to ascertain the degree to which disappointment aversion and expectation proclivity are related; (2) to identify who is most likely to exhibit patterns of disappointment aversion; and (3) to determine to what extent the combination of disappointment aversion and expectation proclivity is associated with financial risk aversion. Design/methodology/approach Several analytic methods were used in this study. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each of the measures examined in this study. Correlation, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression techniques were used to estimate associations between and among the variables of interest in this study. Findings A negative relationship between disappointment aversion and expectation proclivity was noted, which is counter to conventional thinking. It is traditionally thought that those who establish high expectations will experience the greatest disappointment when choice outcomes fall below expectations. In this study, it was determined that when a financial decision-maker consistently establishes high outcome expectations and results fall below expectations, the financial decision-maker feels less disappointment. More precisely, those who consistently establish high expectations tend to be more disappointment tolerant than others. Research limitations/implications This paper provides evidence that categories of disappointment aversion and expectation proclivity are associated with financial risk aversion and certain demographic characteristics. Practical implications This paper adds support for assertions made in the International Journal of Bank Marketing (IJBM) that it is important for financial service professionals and bankers to manage customer expectations to reduce disappointment with products and services. This paper shows that combinations of disappointment aversion and expectation proclivity are related to the financial risk aversion of customers. Social implications Findings from this paper indicate that a commonly used heuristic that decision-makers should reduce expectations to avoid disappointment may not be accurate or particularly useful in the context of financial decision-making. Originality/value Findings from this study add to the existing body of literature by showing that aversion to disappointment and the establishment of expectations, while distinct concepts, are interrelated.

The Effect of Disappointment Aversion on Risk Prevention

Why Can't We Accurately Predict Others' Decisions? Prediction Discrepancy in Risky Decision-Making

The role of disappointment aversion and expectation proclivity in describing financial risk aversion among financial decision-makers

Why Stocks May Disappoint

Toward a Model of Risky Decisions: Synergistic Effect of Affect Intensity and Affective Processing on Risk-Seeking As a Function of Decision Domain

Strategic Customer Behavior with Disappointment Aversion Customers and Two Alleviation Policies

Loss Aversion in Behavioral Decision Making:Influential Factors and Behavioral Manifestation

Study of Impacts from Regret and Uncertainty on Consumer Choice

Research on Loss Aversion and Its Formation in Prospect Theory

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk

Deciding for Future Selves Reduces Loss Aversion

Expectations-Based Loss Aversion May Help Explain Seemingly Dominated Choices in Strategy-Proof Mechanisms

How the Risky Features of Previous Selection Affect Subsequent Decision-Making: Evidence from Behavioral and Fmri Measures

Self-protection and insurance demand with convex premium principles

Background risk, bivariate risk attitudes, and optimal prevention

Risk Perception And Risky Choice: Situational, Informational And Dispositional Effects

Waiting is Painful: the Impact of Anticipated Dread on Negative Discounting in the Loss Domain

Comparative risk aversion in two periods: An application to self‐insurance and self‐protection

Comparative Loss Aversion: Some New Behavioral Implications

A psychological mechanism of surprise impacts risky decision making

Self‐Distancing Regulates the Effect of Incidental Anger (vs. Fear) on Affective Decision‐Making Under Uncertainty