Abstract:The science of modelling choice preferences has evolved into an interdisciplinary field contributing to several branches of microeconomics and mathematical psychology. As theories in decision science and related fields mature, descriptive theories have emerged to explain systematic violations of rationality through cognitive mechanisms underlying the thought processes that guide human behaviour. Cognitive limitations are not, however, solely responsible for systematic deviations from rationality and there is a growing body of literature exploring the effect of visceral factors as the more dominant drivers. This study builds on the existing literature by investigating the impact of anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, hunger, energy, tiredness and stress on three distinct elements that define risk preference: utility, decision weights and loss aversion. By decomposing the impact of visceral factors on risk preference, I am able to provide evidence supporting the proposition that a portion of the variability in individual choice preferences can be explained by interacting visceral states. My findings suggest that visceral factors have the strongest effect on loss aversion, which is a major factor in how people code and evaluate financial outcomes. Anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, energy and tiredness each affect five or more of the model parameters, while hunger and stress are significant only in their interaction with other visceral factors. I also provide evidence to show that the generalized approaches to characterizing visceral factors and risk preference are too broad to be descriptively meaningful. The results of this study show that emotions and other drive states effect the way people process and interpret information, which is crucial in informing decision-makers of the sources and consequences of irrational behaviour. These findings will be of immediate interest to wealth management specialists, public relations advisers as well as to engineers in designing socially intelligent machines capable of interacting more effectively with humans.

Affect Intensity and Risk Preference in Life-Saving Decisions

Toward a Model of Risky Decisions: Synergistic Effect of Affect Intensity and Affective Processing on Risk-Seeking As a Function of Decision Domain

Affection in risk decision-making

No One Left Behind: How Social Distance Affects Life-Saving Decision Making

Eliciting Public Risk Preferences in Emergency Situations

The impact of risk preference on decision-making during evacuation: Behavioral and physiological analysis using event-related potential signals

Differentiating the influence of incidental anger and fear on risk decision-making

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk

Risk Adaptation and Emotion Differentiation: an Experimental Study of Dynamic Decision-Making

Fairness As a Social Cue and Verbal Framing in Risky Choices: an Examination of the Ambiguity and Ambivalence Hypothesis

Comparative Study on Risk Decision Making Based on Emotional Experience and Personality Traits

Differential Effects of Specific Negative Emotions on Individual Risk Preference Behaviors under Social Accidents: an Analysis from the Perspective of Affective Computing Theory

Effects of approach and withdrawal motivation on risk decision making

Risk and emotion: measuring the effect of emotions and other visceral factors on decision making under risk

Exposure to Risk and Risk Aversion: A Laboratory Experiment

Risk Choice and Emotional Experience: a Multi-Level Comparison Between Active and Passive Decision-Making

Risk Perception And Risky Choice: Situational, Informational And Dispositional Effects

Incentives modulate arousal and attention in risky choice

Empirical Study of Individual Evacuation Decision-making in Fire Accidents: Evacuate Intention and Herding Effect.

Why do people make risky decisions during a fire evacuation? Study on the effect of smoke level, individual risk preference, and neighbor behavior

The Role Of Psychological Resilience And Positive Affect In Risky Decision-Making