Abstract:Background To analyze the factors affecting the loss of correction effect in patients with congenital scoliosis after one stage posterior hemivertebra resection, orthosis, fusion and internal fixation. Methods Thirty-nine patients with congenital scoliosis (CS) who underwent one-stage posterior hemivertebra resection, orthosis, fusion and internal fixation were retrospectively included in Hebei Children’s Hospital General demographic information of patients was collected. Preoperative and postoperative imaging indicators were compared, Including cobb Angle of the main curvature of the spine, segmental Cobb Angle, compensatory cephalic curve, compensatory curve on the caudal side, segmental kyphosis, coronal balance, sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and apical vertebra translation. Correlation analysis is used to evaluate the factors affecting the loss of judgment and correction effect, and the correlation indicators are included in the multi-factor Logistics regression. Results In terms of radiographic indicators in the coronal plane, compared to preoperative values, significant improvements were observed in postoperative Cobb Angle of main curve (8.00°±4.62° vs. 33.30°±9.86°), Segmental Cobb angle (11.87°±6.55° vs. 31.29°±10.03°), Compensatory cephalic curve (6.22°±6.33° vs. 14.75°±12.50°), Compensatory curve on the caudal side (5.58°±3.43° vs. 12.61°±8.72°), coronal balance (10.95 mm ± 8.65 mm vs. 13.52 mm ± 11.03 mm), and apical vertebra translation (5.96 mm ± 5.07 mm vs. 16.55 mm ± 8.39 mm) (all P < 0.05). In the sagittal plane, significant improvements were observed in Segmental kyposis Angle (7.60°±9.36° vs. 21.89°±14.62°, P < 0.05) as compared to preoperative values. At the last follow-up, Segmental kyphosis Angle (6.09°±9.75° vs. 21.89°±14.62°, P < 0.05), Thoracic kyphosis (26.57°±7.68° vs. 24.06°±10.49°, P < 0.05) and Lumbar lordosis (32.12°±13.15° vs. 27.84°±16.68°, P < 0.05) had statistical significance compared with the preoperative department. The correlation analysis showed that the correction effect of the main curve Cobb angle was correlated with fixed segment length (rs=-0.318, P = 0.048), postoperative segment Cobb angle (rs=-0.600, P < 0.001), preoperative apical vertebra translation (rs = 0.440, P = 0.005), and spinal cord malformation (rs=-0.437, P = 0.005). The correction effect of segmental kyphosis was correlated with age (rs = 0.388, P = 0.037). The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that postoperative segmental Cobb angle > 10° (OR = 0.011, 95%CI:0.001–0.234, P = 0.004), associated spinal cord anomalies (OR = 24.369, 95%CI:1.057-561.793, P = 0.046), and preoperative apical translation > 10 mm (OR = 0.012, 95%CI:0.000-0.438, P = 0.016) were influential factors in the progression of the main curve Cobb angle. Conclusion The one-stage posterior hemivertebra resection and short-segment corrective fusion with internal fixation are effective means to treat congenital scoliosis. However, attention should be paid to the loss of correction and curve progression during follow-up. Patients with spinal cord malformation and a large preoperative apical vertebra translation have a greater risk of losing the correction after surgery.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Type B and Type C Coronal Pattern Patients with Degenerative Scoliosis

Surgical Strategy and Clinical Outcomes in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Type C Coronal Imbalance

Sequential Correction Technique in Degenerative Scoliosis with Type C Coronal Imbalance: a Comparison with Traditional 2-Rod Technique

[Efficacy of Sequential Correction Based on Satellite Rod Techniquein Degenerative Scoliosis with B-type Coronal Imbalance].

Coronal Curvature and Spinal Imbalance in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: Disc Degeneration is Associated

Cosmetic and Radiological Outcome after Surgical Treatment in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Comparison of Anterior Versus Posterior Approaches

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Lenke Type 1 Idiopathic Scoliosis

Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and complications in patients with degenerative scoliosis undergoing primary versus revision surgery.

Bilateral Apical Vertebral Derotation Technique by Vertebral Column Manipulation Compared with Vertebral Coplanar Alignment Technique in the Correction of Lenke Type 1 Idiopathic Scoliosis.

[Similar Coronal Curvature May Not Represent the Same 3-Dimensional Deformity in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a Matched-Pair Study Using EOS Imaging System].

Comparison of surgical outcomes of lenke type 1 idiopathic scoliosis: vertebral coplanar alignment versus derotation technique.

Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Loss of Correction Effect in Patients with Congenital Scoliosis after One Stage Posterior Hemivertebrae Resection and Orthosis Fusion

The classification of coronal deformity based on preoperative global coronal malalignment for adult spinal deformity is questionable

Postoperative Coronal Imbalance in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evolution, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications

Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Matching Correction of Main and Compensatory Curves is Critical for Immediate Postoperative Coronal Balance in Correction of Severe Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis

Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of anterior decompression with fusion vs. posterior decompression with fixation in kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Comparison of Surgical Burden, Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes According to the Severity of Baseline Sagittal Imbalance in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients

Evaluation of a Combined Approach to the Correction of Congenital Cervical or Cervicothoracic Scoliosis

Risk Factors of Postoperative Coronal Balance Transition in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.

Comparative Analysis of Interval, Skipped, and Key-vertebral Pedicle Screw Strategies for Correction in Patients With Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.