Thermal Stability of CH3NH3PbIxCl3-x Versus [hc(nh2)2]0.83cs0.17pbi 2.7br0.3 Perovskite Films by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Malgorzata Kot,Mykhailo Vorokhta,Zhiping Wang,Henry J. Snaith,Dieter Schmeisser,Jan Ingo Flege
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145596
IF: 6.7
2020-01-01
Applied Surface Science
Abstract:The thermal stability of CH3NH3PbIxCl3-x and [HC(NH2)(2)](0.83)Cs0.17PbI2.7Br0.3 perovskite films was studied insitu by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. It was found that below 85 degrees C both of them are relatively stable. After annealing above 85 degrees C, we observe a clear perovskite surface decomposition, i.e., a release of organic cations and creation of "metallic lead". The mixed cation lead mixed halide perovskite, however, decomposes at a much lower rate. For both perovskite films, the metallic to the total lead ratio changes with the same rate for the same annealing temperatures. The release of A-site cations from the ABX(3) crystal structure of perovskite and/or creation of "metallic lead" causes also a small shift of the valence band maximum towards the Fermi level. The release of [HC(NH2)(2)] (+/-) or Cs (+/-) is not as significant as the release of CH3NH3 +/- ; therefore, it may explain why [HC(NH2)(2)](0.83)Cs0.17PbI2.7Br0.3 solar cells are thermally more stable. Therefore, as the stability of CH3NH3 PbIxCl3-x is same as the stability of [HC(NH2)(2)](0.83)Cs0.17PbI2.7Br0.3 below 85 degrees C, there must be more severe degradation pathways that are currently underappreciated on the solar cell level.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?