Improved Biocompatibility and Osseointegration of Nanostructured Calcium-Incorporated Titanium Implant Surface Treatment (XPEED®)

Kyung Ran Yang,Min-Ho Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112707
IF: 3.4
2024-06-04
Materials
Abstract:Surface treatment of implants facilitates osseointegration, with nanostructured surfaces exhibiting accelerated peri-implant bone regeneration. This study compared bone-to-implant contact (BIC) in implants with hydroxyapatite (HA), sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA), and SLA with calcium (Ca)-coated (XPEED®) surfaces. Seventy-five disk-shaped grade 4 Ti specimens divided into three groups were prepared, with 16 implants per group tested in New Zealand white rabbits. Surface characterization was performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), digital microscopy, and a contact angle analyzer. Cell viability, proliferation, and adhesion were assessed using MC3T3-E1 cells. Apatite formation was evaluated using modified simulated body fluid (m-SBF) incubation. After 4 weeks of healing, the outcomes reviewed were BIC, bone area (BA), removal torque tests, and histomorphometric evaluation. A microstructure analysis revealed irregular pores across all groups, with the XPEED group exhibiting a nanostructured Ca-coated surface. Surface characterization showed a crystalline CaTiO3 layer on XPEED surfaces, with evenly distributed Ca penetrating the implants. All surfaces provided excellent environments for cell growth. The XPEED and SLA groups showed significantly higher cell density and viability with superior osseointegration than HA (p < 0.05); XPEED exhibited the highest absorbance values. Thus, XPEED surface treatment improved implant performance, biocompatibility, stability, and osseointegration.
materials science, multidisciplinary,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering,physics, applied,chemistry, physical, condensed matter
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to improve the surface treatment of titanium implants to enhance their biocompatibility and osseointegration ability. Specifically, the study compared three different surface - treated titanium implants (hydroxyapatite - coated HA, sandblasted and acid - etched SLA, and calcium - containing - coated XPEED®) in a rabbit model in terms of bone - implant contact (BIC), bone area (BA), removal torque test, and histomorphological evaluation, etc., to determine which surface treatment can provide the best osseointegration effect. ### Research Background and Problem Titanium and its alloys are widely used as implant materials due to their excellent biocompatibility and better osseointegration ability. However, in order to further improve the success rate and long - term stability of implants, researchers have been exploring different surface treatment methods to enhance the interaction between implants and surrounding bone tissues. This study aims to find a new surface treatment technology that can significantly improve the osseointegration effect by comparing different surface treatment methods. ### Research Methods The study used 75 grade 4 titanium samples with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 3 mm, which were divided into three groups: - **HA group**: Hydroxyapatite sandblasting treatment - **SLA group**: Alumina sandblasting + acid - etching treatment - **XPEED® group**: Alumina sandblasting + acid - etching + calcium - coating treatment These samples were implanted in a rabbit model for a 4 - week implantation experiment, followed by a variety of characterization and tests, including surface topography analysis, cell viability, proliferation and adhesion tests, calcium phosphate formation ability evaluation, animal experiments and surgical procedures, removal torque test, and histomorphological evaluation. ### Main Findings The study shows that titanium implants with XPEED® surface treatment have the following advantages: - **Nanostructured calcium coating**: SEM images show that the XPEED® group has a nanostructured calcium coating, which is helpful for the formation of early bone cells. - **Higher cell density and viability**: The cell density and viability in the XPEED® and SLA groups are significantly higher than those in the HA group (p < 0.05), and the XPEED® group shows the highest absorption value. - **Better osseointegration performance**: XPEED® surface treatment significantly improves the biocompatibility, stability, and osseointegration ability of implants. In summary, this study verifies the superiority of XPEED® - treated titanium implants in biocompatibility and osseointegration by comparing different surface treatment methods, providing a new option for clinical applications. ### Conclusion By improving the surface treatment of titanium implants, especially by using the XPEED® treatment method, the biocompatibility and osseointegration ability of implants can be significantly improved, thereby promoting the success rate and long - term stability of implants.