Application Of Image Segmentation On Evaluating Infarct Core In Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Ct Perfusion

Zhong-Ping Chen,Ming-Chao Shi,Shuang-Lin Deng,Xin He,Ting-Ting Yuan,Yue Ma,Yu-Zu Yan,Zhuo Wang,Fan Yang,Dan Tong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3285996.3286027
2018-01-01
Abstract:Purpose:Investigate the threshold setting and accuracy of CTP in predicting the infarct core volume of acute ischemic stroke.Material and method:43 acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to the Department of Neurology of the First Hospital of Jilin university underwent Intra-arterial therapy from 2017.1 to 2017.12, and were retrospectively analyzed. Multimodal CT perfusion were examined prior to therapy, and non-contrast CT(NCCT) or MRI were reexamined 2-14 days after onset. Based on the mTICI following DSA intervention, the subjects were further categorized into recanalization positive group(mTICI 2b-3) and recanalization negative group(mTICI<2b). The infarct core volume was predicted via the MTT/CBV dual-threshold by CTP(Threshold setting: MTT>145%; 7 thresholds for CBV with an interval of 0.5, ranging between 2.0-5.0). The final infarct volume(FIV) was determined by follow up NCCT or MRI, and the difference of FIV was analyzed between the recanalization positive group and the recanalization negative group.Results:The FIV and the predicted infarct core volumes were compared among all patients. The predicted volumes by threshold 3 (Z=1.717, p=0.086), threshold 4(Z=0.110, p=0.912) and threshold 5(Z=1.678, p=0.093) were close to the FIV. However, the difference compared to FIV did not differ significantly among threshold 3,4 and 5. The predicted volumes by threshold 2 (Z=1.882, p=0.060), threshold 3(Z=0.154, p=0.877) and threshold 4(Z=1.471, p=0.141) were close to the FIV in the recanalization-positive group.The difference analysis of threshold 2, 3 and 4 revealed closest prediction of threshold 2, with a median volume of 32.61(19.20 similar to 61.74). However, the difference compared to FIV did not differ significantly among threshold 2, 3 and 4. The predicted volumes by threshold threshold 5(Z=1.156, p=0.248),threshold 6(Z=0.800, p=0.424) and threshold 7(Z=0.267, p=0.790) were close to the FIV in the recanalization-negative group. The difference analysis of threshold 5, 6 and 7 revealed closest prediction of threshold 7, with a median volume of 20.92(11.88 similar to 110.63). However, the difference compared to FIV did not differ significantly among threshold 5, 6 and 7.Conclusions: CTP predicted infarct core volume in AIS is highly correlated to FIV. More precise predictions might be achieved via adopting dynamic parameter thresholds based on the state of recanalization.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?